IETF Chair <chair@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We got some feedback on that draft, but the draft stopped short of
> making specific statements about what the IETF should do. And unless we
> bring the thoughts to a bit more practical level, the discussion stays
> abstract and remote. So, I thought I’d try to state my view about what
> we should focus on in the future, in the hopes that it will generate
> discussion. Feel free to suggest alternate views or question these!
> https://www.ietf.org/blog/2016/06/long-term-ietf-evolution/
You tease us to jump to the link where you say:
> 1. Make it easier for people to be involved in the IETF.
> 2. Be even better positioned to use online collaboration.
> 3. Focus on linking open standards to code, operationals, and interoperability.
> 4. Evolve IETF sponsorship models to focus more on our work than meetings.
and I really could not agree more.
I agree with you that our model should change from meeting focused to work focused.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature