Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On May 26, 2016, at 9:15 AM, Barry Raveendran Greene <bgreene@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> If this is being used as the justification, then South Korea must also be changed. Same problem.
> 
>> On May 25, 2016, at 3:08 PM, IAOC Chair <iaoc-chair@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> Reasons for Cancellation of IETF 100 Meeting in Singapore, and the IAOC understands that to be:
>> 
>> “    Singapore laws against same-sex relationships between men and
>>   preventing the recognition of same-sex marriages could create
>>   difficulties for same-sex partners and their children; these have
>>   discouraged affected members of our community from participating
>>   at the IETF meeting in November of 2017 and have also influenced
>>   others to decline to attend in principled solidarity with them.
>> 
>> 
>>   Accordingly, the IETF has decided to postpone indefinitely the meeting
>>   in Singapore and is pursuing alternative venues.”
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Recentattendees mailing list
> Recentattendees@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/recentattendees

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]