Hi David, Thank you for your feedback. On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 04:23:23PM -0500, David Farmer wrote: > > Range Registration Procedures > > 0xFFFF0000-0xFFFF8000 First Come First Served > > 0xFFFF8001-0xFFFFFFFF Standards Action > > And given that the code point that is being defined is 0xFFFF029A and > that falls in the First Come First Served range, technically standards > action isn't required. Furthermore, this draft is really dependant on > RFC3882 and RFC5635, both Informational Status, for a full description > of the intended functionality. If this draft is Standards Track, > some may mistakenly think there is some kind of preference for this > mechanism for triggering Blackholes, vs. the other mechanisms > discussed in RFC3882 and RFC5635. I fully support this defining this > Well-Known BGP Community, however I believe it should be of equal > stature as the other mechanisms discussed in > RFC3882 and RFC5635. > > Therefore, for the above reasons, I think the more appropriate status > for this draft is Informational. In light of what you described here, I don't mind changing the intended status from STD to INFO. Also, I see similarities with NOPEER/RFC3765 which is "Informational" too. Would anyone object to this change? Kind regards, Job