Doing nothing is always an option. These kind folks are proposing doing something, though, rather than nothing. This makes sense, because the working group might no longer exist, and email archives are useless for getting a summary of perhaps a few years of commentary that may have occurred.
Do you have a specific objection to doing something, or do you just not want to have to be the one to do it? :)
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 3:16 PM, MH Michael Hammer (5304) <MHammer@xxxxxx> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Yaron Sheffer
> Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 7:54 AM
> To: IETF
> Subject: How to get feedback on published RFCs [resending as plaintext]
>
> Once an RFC is published, there is essentially no way for readers to provide
> feedback: what works, what are the implementation pitfalls, how does the
> document relate to other technologies or even to other RFCs.
>
> We IETF insiders usually know what is the relevant working group, and can
> take our feedback there. Non-insiders though don't have any contact point,
> and so will most likely keep their feedback to themselves. These non-IETFers
> are the target audience of our documents! Unfortunately, our so-called
> "Requests for Comments" are anything but an invitation to submit
> comments.
>
A simple solution would be to include a pointer to the relevant working group as a header or note to the RFC. There could be a standard "How to comment" section. No need for additional tools or process.
Mke