|
I have no specific objection to doing something. I wasn’t planning on being the one to do anything anyways. I do have a concern about your comment about getting a summary of perhaps a few years of commentary. The problem with tools that annotate comments against the
RFC is that anyone looking at just those comments does not get the complete picture. Even if the working group is closed, pointing people to the group/archive gives someone the opportunity to get a more complete picture. Your comment may also be taken as a
reason for keeping mailing lists open for an extended period even after the working group is no longer active. Every once in a while therew ill be a post to the DKIM or SPF lists by someone with a question or comment – even though those groups have been inactive
for some time. Mike From: Ted Lemon [mailto:mellon@xxxxxxxxx]
Doing nothing is always an option. These kind folks are proposing doing something, though, rather than nothing. This makes sense, because the working group might no longer exist, and email archives are useless for getting a summary
of perhaps a few years of commentary that may have occurred. Do you have a specific objection to doing something, or do you just not want to have to be the one to do it? :) On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 3:16 PM, MH Michael Hammer (5304) <MHammer@xxxxxx> wrote:
|