Re: [nfsv4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-06.txt> (Parallel NFS (pNFS) SCSI Layout) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Black, David" <david.black@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-06.txt> (Parallel NFS (pNFS) SCSI Layout) to Proposed Standard
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 10:37:24 +0200
Cc: "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>, "draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout@xxxxxxxx" <draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout@xxxxxxxx>, "nfsv4-chairs@xxxxxxxx" <nfsv4-chairs@xxxxxxxx>, "nfsv4@xxxxxxxx" <nfsv4@xxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362F5F15F6@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
References: <20160628150730.24155.95557.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362F5D4F49@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com> <20160718043512.GA19492@lst.de> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362F5F15F6@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 08:26:38AM +0000, Black, David wrote:
> - Yes, making 4k alignment a MUST would be a fine thing to do now.

Can we converge on a MUST for the device logical block size, be that
512, 4k or any other value that might happen in the future?

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [nfsv4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-06.txt> (Parallel NFS (pNFS) SCSI Layout) to Proposed Standard
  - From: Black, David

References:
- RE: [nfsv4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-06.txt> (Parallel NFS (pNFS) SCSI Layout) to Proposed Standard
  - From: Black, David
- Re: [nfsv4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-06.txt> (Parallel NFS (pNFS) SCSI Layout) to Proposed Standard
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- RE: [nfsv4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-06.txt> (Parallel NFS (pNFS) SCSI Layout) to Proposed Standard
  - From: Black, David

Prev by Date: RE: [nfsv4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-06.txt> (Parallel NFS (pNFS) SCSI Layout) to Proposed Standard
Next by Date: How to get feedback on published RFCs
Previous by thread: RE: [nfsv4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-06.txt> (Parallel NFS (pNFS) SCSI Layout) to Proposed Standard
Next by thread: RE: [nfsv4] Last Call: <draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-06.txt> (Parallel NFS (pNFS) SCSI Layout) to Proposed Standard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]