Eliot Lear <lear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> One approach, therefore, would be to follow Michael Richardson's
> suggestion to shorten WG times, but perhaps provide for announced
> breakouts where rooms are assigned, and where AV is available. Those
> meetings might take place at lunch, after dinner, before the first
> normal WG meeting of the day, etc. These ad hocs would focus on a
> single task or area. Multiple ad hocs might occur simultaneously, even
> from the same WG.
This is exactly what I had in mind.
I hadn't thought about the multiple ad-hocs, but for a group like 6man this
would make sense.
I also had some additional notion that if a group needed more than 1hr,
that they would get the 1hr, followed immediately with a 1hr allocation to a
"side" room.
(The side room allocation would ignore all conflicts)
(Some might want more than 1hr, but I think a break makes sense, and an
additional allocation...)
> This idea would clearly require other changes, and would probably cost
> money. But perhaps it's an idea to consider. The benefit is that those
> working on particularly gnarly issues can get some additional time all
> together. The reason that Marc held so many interims was that httpbis
> needed more than two hours in a week.
yes...
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature