Re: IMHO we really need a discussion of this imaginative proposal.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Richard Shockey <richard@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IMHO we really need a discussion of this imaginative proposal.
From: Jared Mauch <jared@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 17:53:59 -0400
Cc: "ietf@xxxxxxxx Discussion" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <6BD23C89-095B-4155-8777-D7F03929C5FE@shockey.us>
References: <6BD23C89-095B-4155-8777-D7F03929C5FE@shockey.us>

This is just a more robust version of the BOFH server. 

Jared Mauch

> On Jun 18, 2016, at 9:00 PM, Richard Shockey <richard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Certainly a BOF. < grin>

References:
- IMHO we really need a discussion of this imaginative proposal.
  - From: Richard Shockey

Prev by Date: IMHO we really need a discussion of this imaginative proposal.
Next by Date: Re: WG Review: Meeting Venue (mtgvenue)
Previous by thread: IMHO we really need a discussion of this imaginative proposal.
Next by thread: Re: WG Review: Meeting Venue (mtgvenue)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]