Hi Ted,
At 11:10 25-05-2016, Ted Hardie wrote:
A same sex male couple attending the IETF in Singapore will break
the law to have a normal family life. Suspending that life for a
week may have no great important or lasting impact to some; for
others it may mean they cannot attend except remotely. That latter
choice may have an impact on what jobs they can do for the IETF and
may have an impact on their employers' view of their work.
I understand that giving a person a choice about whether to break the
law or not is a problematic choice.
There is a message at
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/msg14921.html
from the IAB about a volunteer to serve on the ICANN
Technical Liaison Group with the following requirement: "The ICANN
TLG is expected to meet in person at or around the three ICANN
meetings held each year". Would the inability to attend, for
example, an ICANN meeting for the reason I mentioned above be a
disqualifying factor?
Regards,
S. Moonesamy