> I would expect this proposed community to be used along with adding
> no-export on receipt at the peer, because sending the community more
> broadly isn't as helpful.
and we all know accidents never happen. and, networks which do not
implement also will not drop export.
> I suggest that if there are objections to the current version we get
> some text on-list where we can hash out next-steps, if there's no text
> offered I think we all vote to move this document forward.
when something is fatally flawed, adding or changing text is not gonna
help a lot.
to make this not a serious attack vector, one or more of the following
are needed:
o non-transitive
o not well-known (which saves it today)
o authenticated (no sidr is not very helpful. though there might be a
hack where the the community also contains a sig by the prefix
owner. but it would take the sidr wg five years to nit pick it to
death)
randy