> On 11 Jul 2016, at 20:34, John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > --On Monday, July 11, 2016 20:22 +0100 Tim Chown > <tjc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> On 11 Jul 2016, at 19:07, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I have some personal opinions about these things, but >>> ultimately, what does the community want to do? >> >> Can we make sure this question is asked explicitly in the >> post-meeting survey? That would allow feedback to be collated >> in an efficient way. > > Remember that post-meeting surveys historically do not reach > anyone who does not attend in person. To the extent to which > this is ultimately a strategic decision that affects the > community (and, to some extent, who can participate effectively > in the IETF), everyone needs to be asked (and, as Dave Crocker > points out, asking in a plenary doesn't do the job either0. Sure, but asking on the survey gets a valuable indication of the impact of those who did attend, and who experienced the experiment. Tim