Hi, > On 11 Jul 2016, at 19:07, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I have some personal opinions about these things, but ultimately, what does the community want to do? Can we make sure this question is asked explicitly in the post-meeting survey? That would allow feedback to be collated in an efficient way. I’d just add a data point on overall meeting time, comparing Berlin to the previous two European meetings: Berlin (July 2016) Mon 10.00am - 8.00pm Tue 10.00am - 6.20pm Wed 10.00am - 8.10pm Thu 10.00am - 7.30pm Fri 10.00am - 1.20pm Prague (July 2015) Mon 9.00am - 7.50pm (+50 mins) Tue 9.30am - 6.40pm (+50 mins) Wed 9.00am - 7.40pm (+30 mins) Thu 9.00am - 7.10pm (+40 mins) Fri 9.00am - 1.20pm (+60 mins) So Prague had 3 hours and 50 minutes extra session time, but two plenaries. London (March 2014) Mon 9.00am - 7.50pm (+50 mins) Tue 9.00am - 6.40pm (+50 mins) Wed 9.00am - 8.20pm (+70 mins) Thu 9.00am - 8.40pm (+130 mins) Fri 9.00am - 1.20pm (+60 mins) And London had 6 hours extra session time, but also an extra plenary. So we do seem to have cut down on overall meeting time by shifting to a 10am start, having not recovered the time ‘lost’ to one plenary. And our meeting has 6 hours less session time than we had in London for IETF 89. (And that is a Friday’s worth…) Tim