Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> That said, I'm not sure we have a concrete proposal for a thing to do.
> if you write a draft and have running example code, you are accused to
> be just coming to the ietf for a rubber stamp (cf. sidr). if you have a
> draft and no code, idiots such as i comment that the rubber meets the
> sky. if you have code but no draft, you're a undisciplined hacker,
> unless we're in an even numbered year where we're trying to snuggle up
> to code.
> imiho, we would benefit from making it easier to come in with a draft
> and code, the first above.
+5.
And make it easier to do:
1) Informational on running code.
2) Spin to 2.0 for Standards Track.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature