NATs necessary for IPv6, says IETF chair

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



morning all,

i was a bit confused after i read this 2 articles

>  NAT gets added to IPv6 after all

http://www.techworld.com/networking/features/index.cfm?featureid=4167&pagtype=all

> NATs necessary for IPv6, says IETF chair

http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/072109-nat-housley-qna.html

i am afraid that after 10 Years of NAT that it will survive and itojun would turn into his grave.

http://ipv6samurais.com/ipv6samurais/demystified/nat-problem.html

just my 2 cents

greetings

Marc

--

Les enfants teribbles - research and deployment
Marc Manthey - head of research and innovation
Hildeboldplatz 1a D - 50672 Köln - Germany
Tel.:0049-221-3558032
Mobil:0049-1577-3329231
jabber :marc@xxxxxxxxxx
blog : http://www.let.de
ipv6 http://stattfernsehen.com
xing : https://www.xing.com/profile/Marc_Manthey





_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]