The headline is pretty misleading. The content seems accurate.
Brian
On 2008-07-29 00:55, Marc Manthey wrote:> morning all,> > i was a bit confused after i read this 2 articles> >> NAT gets added to IPv6 after all> > http://www.techworld.com/networking/features/index.cfm?featureid=4167&pagtype=all> > >> NATs necessary for IPv6, says IETF chair> > http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/072109-nat-housley-qna.html> > i am afraid that after 10 Years of NAT that it will survive and itojun> would turn into his grave.> > http://ipv6samurais.com/ipv6samurais/demystified/nat-problem.html> > just my 2 cents> > greetings> > Marc> > -- > > Les enfants teribbles - research and deployment> Marc Manthey - head of research and innovation> Hildeboldplatz 1a D - 50672 Köln - Germany> Tel.:0049-221-3558032> Mobil:0049-1577-3329231> jabber :marc@xxxxxxxxxx> blog : http://www.let.de> ipv6 http://stattfernsehen.com> xing : https://www.xing.com/profile/Marc_Manthey> > > > > > _______________________________________________> Ietf mailing list> Ietf@xxxxxxxx> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>
_______________________________________________Ietf mailing listIetf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf