Am 24.07.2008 um 16:04 schrieb Marshall Eubanks:
Hello Marc;
On Jul 24, 2008, at 9:18 AM, Marc Manthey wrote:
Am 24.07.2008 um 14:52 schrieb Marshall Eubanks:
On Jul 24, 2008, at 8:10 AM, Marc Manthey wrote:
hello experts
just a question , why not use
<http://www.accessgrid.org/> you could save a lot of CO2 ;)
Accessgrid in my experience requires some work to set up and use
(and troubleshoot).
hello Marshall,
thanks for your response , from my perspective , accessgrid run
without trouble
on osx , just installed it from binary and it uses opensource
( jabber ) and free resources
like vic and rat and is available for Windows aswell. There is
continue developing , even h264 is available now
<http://mediatools.cs.ucl.ac.uk/nets/mmedia/>
I am not sure why being acquired by Google makes it unusable for us,
or if being open-source is a requirement or
even a SHOULD.
gday again
sorry i thought IEFT SHOULD use non - patented and propietairy
technologie.like jaber for i.e.
But that's why there is a consensus process here.
i am looking forward to see / hear results ;)
regards
Marc
Regards
Marshall
AFAIK , VRVS / EVO is not available for PC
UMeeting and Team Speak, or even Telepresence of the Cisco or
Polycom RPX varieties.
Dont know "Umeeting " but Teamspeak is not open source aswell and
does not support video and this would be helpful for presenting
slides
in a "venue"
I would recommend that we actually study and evaluate the choices
available,
+1
i think it would be a great improvement for developers / attendies
from third world countrys or people that cant afford traveling to
the meeting.
> "Teleconferencing", in this context, includes any
> communications vehicle that enables participants to meet
> without having to travel,
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf