Exactly. Nicely articulated.
Leslie.
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 09:29:53AM -0700, Dave CROCKER wrote:
>
>> If a candidate wishes to encourage openness and encourage a broader
>> base of input to Nomcom, they can and should disclose their
>> candidacy. Nomcom will benefit from having better information, for
>> the candidates who choose to publicly disclose their candidacy,
>> because more people will know that comments on a particular
>> candidate are needed.
>
> I had exactly the opposite reaction to Leslie Daigle's remark. If
> people start declaring, then I expect that over time, people who
> declare will be more likely to be selected than people who don't.
> This is because the Nomcom will get more feedback about the
> "declareds" than about the "undeclareds". I imagine that Nomcom
> members will naturally tend to prefer those candidates about whom they
> have the most information.
>
> So the practice of declaring by even a significant minority will
> naturally tend to mean that all aspirants have to declare, or give up
> their aspirations.
>
> I don't know whether this would be a good or bad thing, but I don't
> think we should dismiss the observation that changing the rules, even
> informally, changes the rules for everyone.
>
> A
>
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
"Reality:
Yours to discover."
-- ThinkingCat
Leslie Daigle
leslie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf