At 3:01 AM +0200 8/26/08, Frank Ellermann wrote: >Paul Hoffman wrote: > >>> It has to be tuned for the "or more" part of "one or more". > >> I can't fully parse your meaning, but I think I disagree. > >Yes, I also think we disagree. I prefer one file and URL per >figure, avoiding all questions of TARs / ZIPs / JARs / TGZs >to bundle them. There are no such questions with the proposal. The RFC Editor gets to decide how to handle this instead of us trying to mandate this from IETF consensus. > > The RFC Editor, on a case-by-case basis, can choose to have > > one file containing multiple figures, or multiple files. > >Can we maybe agree on "one subdirectory" for these "packs" ? No. For one, I didn't say "packs", you did. For another, it is silly to try to lock this down now before we have working examples of what would be best. >I'd like to have a "one-click interface" (IPR: ammazon) per >figure. And I would like the RFC Editor to have flexibility to do the right thing as time moves on. >P.S., unrelated, John wrote about UTF-8: > >| I don't see any point in trying to discuss or critique such >| proposals until there is one... > >http://purl.net/xyzzy/home/test/draft-hoffman-utf8-rfcs-01.txt ...which is long-expired for very good reason. --Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf