Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 2:09 PM +0200 9/3/08, Julian Reschke wrote:
>I'm tempted to say that if it takes the authors months to update the
>document with the suggested change, then, well, a publication delay of
>several months is what they deserve :-).

+1

Given that the great majority of documents in the "authors are too 
slow to post a new draft" state are WG items, a two-line note from 
the AD to the WG upbraiding the authors for not turning in the new 
draft should get a quick result. Better still, the original note that 
was asking for a new draft with minor edits can be Cc'd to the WG as 
well.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]