On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 02:11:48PM -0400, Daniel Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Joel Jaeggli <joelja@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Or you know not consenting to interviews with someone who's professionalism > > you don't respect. Why you would expect someone engaged in serious > > journalism or otherwise to offer you the opportunity to modulate your own > > statements post facto is beyond me. > > To change what was said, no. To ensure that it's taken in the > proper context, yes. It's done in the media every day. I think it is unwise to assume that you will get an opportunity to review a story before publication - let alone offer comments or corrections - unless you have specifically negotiated that right with the reporter and perhaps their superiors. YMMV. IANAL. -- Ted Faber http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
Attachment:
pgp3Nu6zhAfoY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf