Ole Jacobsen wrote:
I agree with Paul.Having now quickly read the article in question I don't even see what the "problem" is, including the somewhat provocative headline.
I think it's a huge problem if the market gets the idea that NATs (as we currently know them) will also be a part of IPv6.
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf