Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/15/08 at 2:42 PM -0400, Michael StJohns wrote:

>So its really not a fair and level playing ground.  Either all 
>should do it or none.
>
>Note that there are arguments that go the other way - but most of 
>those could somewhat be cured by the non-public candidate making 
>things public.  I'm not arguing that making candidacy public is the 
>way to go - and in fact I see more problems that not with going that 
>way, but I am arguing that a voluntary approach such as Pete is 
>recommending is worse than either of the two alternatives.

I will repeat that the current state of affairs is neither "all" nor 
"none". RFC 3777 has no rule in this regard; it is currently 
voluntary. And some people have always disclosed. So I'm simply 
suggesting that we voluntarily get closer to "all" and start 
encouraging the "cultural sophistication" Leslie talked about.

pr
-- 
Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]