Red Hat Fedora Testing

• Thread Index

• Re: qa-devel meeting this week (Wednesday or Thursday)
  • From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
• Re: [Bug 1006304] BootLoaderError: failed to set new efi boot target
  • From: Robert Moskowitz
• Re: [Bug 1006304] BootLoaderError: failed to set new efi boot target
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: Hello Everyone,
  • From: Mike Ruckman
• Hello Everyone,
  • From: Chris A. Roberts
• qa-devel meeting this week (Wednesday or Thursday)
  • From: Tim Flink
• 2014-01-06 - Fedora QA Meeting - minutes
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: fedora in 2013
  • From: Tim Flink
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Kamil Paral
• Re: fedora in 2013
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: [Bug 1006304] BootLoaderError: failed to set new efi boot target
  • From: Robert Moskowitz
• Re: fedora in 2013
  • From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
• Re: fedora in 2013
  • From: Alexander Todorov
• fedora in 2013
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Test-Announce] 2014-01-06 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting
  • From: Chris A. Roberts
• rawhide report: 20140106 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• [Test-Announce] 2014-01-06 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: [Bug 1006304] BootLoaderError: failed to set new efi boot target
  • From: Robert Moskowitz
• Re: [Bug 1006304] BootLoaderError: failed to set new efi boot target
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: [Bug 1006304] BootLoaderError: failed to set new efi boot target
  • From: Robert Moskowitz
• Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 19 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• rawhide report: 20140105 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: [Bug 1006304] BootLoaderError: failed to set new efi boot target
  • From: Robert Moskowitz
• Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 19 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Re: [Bug 1006304] BootLoaderError: failed to set new efi boot target
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: [Bug 1006304] BootLoaderError: failed to set new efi boot target
  • From: Robert Moskowitz
• Re: [Bug 1006304] BootLoaderError: failed to set new efi boot target
  • From: Robert Moskowitz
• Re: [Bug 1006304] BootLoaderError: failed to set new efi boot target
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: [Bug 1006304] BootLoaderError: failed to set new efi boot target
  • From: Robert Moskowitz
• Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 19 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• RE: Updated QA Join page
  • From: John Dulaney
• Re: Updated QA Join page
  • From: Barneedhar
• rawhide report: 20140104 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: Updated QA Join page
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Updated QA Join page
  • From: Mike Ruckman
• Re: [Bug 1006304] BootLoaderError: failed to set new efi boot target
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 19 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Re: [Bug 1006304] BootLoaderError: failed to set new efi boot target
  • From: Robert Moskowitz
• Re: [Bug 1006304] BootLoaderError: failed to set new efi boot target
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: [Bug 1006304] BootLoaderError: failed to set new efi boot target
  • From: Robert Moskowitz
• Re: [Bug 1006304] BootLoaderError: failed to set new efi boot target
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 19 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• rawhide report: 20140103 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 19 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Re: F19 -> F20 upgrade disaster , and now just boot with debug in kernel boot parameters
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: Fedora 20 release day FedUp bug: post-mortem
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: [Bug 1006304] BootLoaderError: failed to set new efi boot target
  • From: poma
• Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 19 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Now Bug 1047993 - Re: [Bug 1006304] BootLoaderError: failed to set new efi boot target
  • From: Robert Moskowitz
• Re: Fedora 20 release day FedUp bug: post-mortem
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: F19 -> F20 upgrade disaster , and now just boot with debug in kernel boot parameters
  • From: Michal Jaegermann
• F19 -> F20 upgrade disaster , and now just boot with debug in kernel boot parameters
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• rawhide report: 20140102 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: powertop and tuned
  • From: Christopher Meng
• powertop and tuned
  • From: Robert M. Albrecht
• Re: [Bug 1006304] BootLoaderError: failed to set new efi boot target
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: [Bug 1006304] BootLoaderError: failed to set new efi boot target
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: [Bug 1006304] BootLoaderError: failed to set new efi boot target
  • From: Robert Moskowitz
• rawhide report: 20140101 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 19 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 19 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Re: [Bug 1006304] BootLoaderError: failed to set new efi boot target
  • From: Robert Moskowitz
• Re: [Bug 1006304] BootLoaderError: failed to set new efi boot target
  • From: Robert Moskowitz
• Re: [Bug 1006304] BootLoaderError: failed to set new efi boot target
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: [Bug 1006304] BootLoaderError: failed to set new efi boot target
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: [Bug 1006304] BootLoaderError: failed to set new efi boot target
  • From: Robert Moskowitz
• Re: [Bug 1006304] BootLoaderError: failed to set new efi boot target
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: bug 1006304 - Re: Many attempts to install f20 today
  • From: Robert Moskowitz
• Re: bug 1006304 - Re: Many attempts to install f20 today
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: bug 1006304 - Re: Many attempts to install f20 today
  • From: Robert Moskowitz
• Re: bug 1006304 - Re: Many attempts to install f20 today
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: bug 1006304 - Re: Many attempts to install f20 today
  • From: Robert Moskowitz
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 19 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Re: bug 1006304 - Re: Many attempts to install f20 today
  • From: Adam Williamson
• bug 1006304 - Re: Many attempts to install f20 today
  • From: Robert Moskowitz
• rawhide report: 20131231 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 19 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 19 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Re: Fedora 20 release day FedUp bug: post-mortem
  • From: Rahul Sundaram
• Re: Fedora 20 release day FedUp bug: post-mortem
  • From: Felix Miata
• Re: Fedora 20 release day FedUp bug: post-mortem
  • From: Rahul Sundaram
• rawhide report: 20131230 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: 2013-12-23 - Fedora QA Meeting - recap
  • From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
• Re: Fedora 20 release day FedUp bug: post-mortem
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Fedora 20 release day FedUp bug: post-mortem
  • From: Felix Miata
• 2013-12-23 - Fedora QA Meeting - recap
  • From: Adam Williamson
• [Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2013-12-30 Fedora QA Meeting
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Fedora 20 release day FedUp bug: post-mortem
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 19 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• rawhide report: 20131229 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 19 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• rawhide report: 20131228 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 19 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Re: Bug 1046701 – NetworkManager hides DNS resolver search list setting in Fedora 20
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Many attempts to install f20 today -
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Bug 1046701 – NetworkManager hides DNS resolver search list setting in Fedora 20
  • From: Jonathan Kamens
• Re: Many attempts to install f20 today -
  • From: Robert Moskowitz
• rawhide report: 20131227 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: Many attempts to install f20 today -
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Fedup 19 -> 20 failure in a KVM instance
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 19 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Re: F20 rescue kernel broken on kernel update
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: F20 rescue kernel broken on kernel update
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Selinux out of control
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Bug 1046701 – NetworkManager hides DNS resolver search list setting in Fedora 20
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Bug 1046701 – NetworkManager hides DNS resolver search list setting in Fedora 20
  • From: Jonathan Kamens
• rawhide report: 20131226 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: Something wrong with F20 updates-testing, clutter and Gnome?
  • From: Ville-Pekka Vainio
• Something wrong with F20 updates-testing, clutter and Gnome?
  • From: Ville-Pekka Vainio
• Re: Selinux out of control
  • From: drago01
• Many attempts to install f20 today -
  • From: Robert Moskowitz
• Re: Selinux out of control
  • From: Michał Piotrowski
• Re: Selinux out of control
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: F20 rescue kernel broken on kernel update
  • From: Chris Murphy
• F20 rescue kernel broken on kernel update
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: Selinux out of control
  • From: Shawn Starr
• Selinux out of control
  • From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
• Re: Fedup 19 -> 20 failure in a KVM instance
  • From: Shawn Starr
• Fedup 19 -> 20 failure in a KVM instance
  • From: Shawn Starr
• rawhide report: 20131225 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 19 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• rawhide report: 20131224 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: Thoughts about Travis-CI integration
  • From: Alexander Todorov
• Fedora 19 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Re: emacs unusable remotely on f20!
  • From: Paul Black
• Re: emacs unusable remotely on f20!
  • From: Neal Becker
• Re: emacs unusable remotely on f20!
  • From: Jonathan Kamens
• emacs unusable remotely on f20!
  • From: Neal Becker
• rawhide report: 20131223 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 19 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• rawhide report: 20131222 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: xserver fails to resume from suspend (f20)
  • From: Neal Becker
• Fedora 19 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Re: Thoughts about Travis-CI integration
  • From: Christopher Meng
• Re: updates-testing unknown filesystem type 'btrfs'
  • From: Chris Murphy
• updates-testing unknown filesystem type 'btrfs'
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: Enabling Updates repo in F20 install
  • From: Robert Moskowitz
• Re: 3.12 kernels get stuck midway and do not get to gdm
  • From: Adam Williamson
• rawhide report: 20131221 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: xserver fails to resume from suspend (f20)
  • From: Neal Becker
• Re: 3.12 kernels get stuck midway and do not get to gdm
  • From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
• Re: 3.12 kernels get stuck midway and do not get to gdm
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: 3.12 kernels get stuck midway and do not get to gdm
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: 3.12 kernels get stuck midway and do not get to gdm
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: 3.12 kernels get stuck midway and do not get to gdm
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: 3.12 kernels get stuck midway and do not get to gdm
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: 3.12 kernels get stuck midway and do not get to gdm
  • From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
• Re: 3.12 kernels get stuck midway and do not get to gdm
  • From: Dan Mossor
• Re: xserver fails to resume from suspend (f20)
  • From: Dan Mossor
• Re: 3.12 kernels get stuck midway and do not get to gdm
  • From: "Germán A. Racca"
• Re: Enabling Updates repo in F20 install
  • From: Samuel Sieb
• Fedora 19 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Re: 3.12 kernels get stuck midway and do not get to gdm
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: xserver fails to resume from suspend (f20)
  • From: Adam Williamson
• 3.12 kernels get stuck midway and do not get to gdm
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: xserver fails to resume from suspend (f20)
  • From: Richard Ryniker
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: Richard Ryniker
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
• Enabling Updates repo in F20 install
  • From: Robert Moskowitz
• Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Dan Mossor
• Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
  • From: Kamil Paral
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Kamil Paral
• rawhide report: 20131220 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: Very rough storage validation matrix draft
  • From: Kamil Paral
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Temlakos
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Phil Dobbin
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: Kamil Paral
• [Test-Announce] 2013-12-23 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting
  • From: Adam Williamson
• 2013-12-16 - Fedora QA Meeting - recap
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Fedora 19 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Re: Recommended system requirements for f20 not sufficient?
  • From: Lars Seipel
• Re: Recommended system requirements for f20 not sufficient?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Recommended system requirements for f20 not sufficient?
  • From: Lars Seipel
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Gavin Flower
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Gavin Flower
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Patrick O'Callaghan
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Gavin Flower
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Gavin Flower
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Philippe LeCavalier
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Temlakos
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Frank Murphy
• Re: Sugar tweaked on desktop validation matrix
  • From: Dan Mossor
• Re: Recommended system requirements for f20 not sufficient?
  • From: Felix Miata
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Gavin Flower
• Re: Recommended system requirements for f20 not sufficient?
  • From: Dan Mossor
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: xserver fails to resume from suspend (f20)
  • From: Neal Becker
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Temlakos
• Re: xserver fails to resume from suspend (f20)
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
  • From: Kamil Paral
• Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
  • From: Kamil Paral
• rawhide report: 20131219 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: xserver fails to resume from suspend (f20)
  • From: Neal Becker
• Re: Thoughts about Travis-CI integration
  • From: Alexander Todorov
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Temlakos
• Re: Rawhide heads up - password auth for ssh and selinux
  • From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
• Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 19 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Sugar tweaked on desktop validation matrix
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Rawhide heads up - password auth for ssh and selinux
  • From: Bruno Wolff III
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: xserver fails to resume from suspend (f20)
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: xserver fails to resume from suspend (f20)
  • From: Neal Becker
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Philippe LeCavalier
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Temlakos
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Philippe LeCavalier
• Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
  • From: nonamedotc
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Bruno Medeiros
• [Test-Announce] Reminder: Fedora 18 end of life on 2014-01-14
  • From: Dennis Gilmore
• Re: [Fedora QA] #8: Checklist
  • From: Fedora QA
• Re: [Fedora QA] #8: Checklist
  • From: Fedora QA
• Re: [Fedora QA] #278: Joining the proven testers
  • From: Fedora QA
• Re: [Fedora QA] #309: Request to join proven testers.
  • From: Fedora QA
• Re: [Fedora QA] #299: Proven tester mentor request
  • From: Fedora QA
• Re: [Fedora QA] #298: Proventester Mentor Request
  • From: Fedora QA
• Re: [Fedora QA] #294: Want to become proventester - michalb
  • From: Fedora QA
• Re: [Fedora QA] #293: proventester request
  • From: Fedora QA
• Re: [Fedora QA] #281: Requesting a proven tester mentor
  • From: Fedora QA
• Re: [Fedora QA] #229: asking to join the proven testers and requesting a mentor (was: Proven Tester group/mentor request denied due to defunct group.)
  • From: Fedora QA
• Re: [Fedora QA] #268: asking to join the proven testers and requesting a mentor
  • From: Fedora QA
• Re: [Fedora QA] #254: proventester request
  • From: Fedora QA
• Re: [Fedora QA] #249: Proventester mentor request
  • From: Fedora QA
• Re: [Fedora QA] #229: Proven Tester group/mentor request denied due to defunct group. (was: asking to join the proven testers and requesting a mentor)
  • From: Fedora QA
• Re: xserver fails to resume from suspend (f20)
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: xserver fails to resume from suspend (f20)
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• AutoQA 0.8.5 Released
  • From: Tim Flink
• Re: Recommended system requirements for f20 not sufficient?
  • From: Akshay Vyas
• Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
  • From: poma
• Re: Recommended system requirements for f20 not sufficient?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Karma request: LibreOffice
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Recommended system requirements for f20 not sufficient?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: RC1 and UEFI
  • From: poma
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Philippe LeCavalier
• Re: Thoughts about Travis-CI integration
  • From: Tim Flink
• Re: Karma request: LibreOffice
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Thoughts about Travis-CI integration
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Thoughts about Travis-CI integration
  • From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
• Thoughts about Travis-CI integration
  • From: Alexander Todorov
• Recommended system requirements for f20 not sufficient?
  • From: Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
• Re: Karma request: LibreOffice
  • From: Bob Lightfoot
• rawhide report: 20131218 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: Karma request: LibreOffice
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: xserver fails to resume from suspend (f20)
  • From: Neal Becker
• xserver fails to resume from suspend (f20)
  • From: Neal Becker
• Re: Karma request: LibreOffice
  • From: Carlos Morel-Riquelme
• Re: Karma request: LibreOffice
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Karma request: LibreOffice
  • From: Frank Murphy
• Re: Karma request: LibreOffice
  • From: Carlos Morel-Riquelme
• Karma request: LibreOffice
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: William Morris
• [Test-Announce] PSA: Use fedup 0.8 for upgrades to Fedora 20! (was Re: Should a working fedup in Fedora N's stable repository be a release criterion for N+1?)
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: fedup f19-f20 success (sort of)
  • From: Neal Becker
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
• Re: fedup f19-f20 success (sort of)
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: fedup f19-f20 success (sort of)
  • From: Michal Jaegermann
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Philippe LeCavalier
• RE: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: John Dulaney
• rawhide report: 20131217 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Philippe LeCavalier
• Re: Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: Michael Cronenworth
• Re: Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: Adam Williamson
• More on storage validation strategy (was: Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications)
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: fedup f19-f20 success (sort of)
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: Michael Cronenworth
• Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 19 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• fedup f19-f20 success (sort of)
  • From: Neal Becker
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Dan Scott
• Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
  • From: Gavin Flower
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: R P Herrold
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Philippe LeCavalier
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Philippe LeCavalier
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: C. E. Kunkel
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Joel Gomberg
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Philippe LeCavalier
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Philippe LeCavalier
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Neal Becker
• Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Philippe LeCavalier
• any report of fedup f19->f20?
  • From: Neal Becker
• [Test-Announce] Announcing the release of Fedora 20.
  • From: Robyn Bergeron
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
• Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Peter Robinson
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Akshay Vyas
• Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Pete Travis
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Akshay Vyas
• RE: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: John Dulaney
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
  • From: nonamedotc
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Bob Lightfoot
• Re: Draft combined checksums test case and sanity matrix
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 19 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: R P Herrold
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Mike Ruckman
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Mike Ruckman
• Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: nonamedotc
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Bruno Wolff III
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Bruno Wolff III
• Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
• Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Dan Mossor
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Mike Ruckman
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Mike Ruckman
• Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
  • From: nonamedotc
• Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
• Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
  • From: nonamedotc
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
• Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Introduction to QA - or, howto become a tester
  • From: Adam Williamson
• RC1.1 at Caddyshack
  • From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
• Introduction to QA - or, howto become a tester
  • From: Dan Mossor
• rawhide report: 20131216 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
  • From: Harald Hoyer
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Draft combined checksums test case and sanity matrix
  • From: Adam Williamson
• [Test-Announce] 2013-12-16 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: gnome-session-properties.desktop with NoDisplay=true
  • From: Bruno Medeiros
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: Richard Ryniker
• Re: Avahi bollixing local network?
  • From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
• Re: Avahi bollixing local network?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: Ian Malone
• Avahi bollixing local network?
  • From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
• rawhide report: 20131215 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: Gavin Flower
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 19 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: Richard Ryniker
• Re: UEFI install on MBR partition scheme, was: Failed attempt to fpaste UEFI failure data
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: UEFI install on MBR partition scheme, was: Failed attempt to fpaste UEFI failure data
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: UEFI install on MBR partition scheme, was: Failed attempt to fpaste UEFI failure data
  • From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
• Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: Thomas Gilliard
• Re: UEFI install on MBR partition scheme, was: Failed attempt to fpaste UEFI failure data
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: UEFI install on MBR partition scheme, was: Failed attempt to fpaste UEFI failure data
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: UEFI install on MBR partition scheme, was: Failed attempt to fpaste UEFI failure data
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: Fedora 20 RC1 AMIs
  • From: Dennis Gilmore
• Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
  • From: nonamedotc
• Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
  • From: Dan Mossor
• Re: F18 up to F20 -- how?
  • From: Beartooth
• Re: Failed attempt to fpaste UEFI failure data
  • From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
• Re: Failed attempt to fpaste UEFI failure data
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
  • From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
• Re: Failed attempt to fpaste UEFI failure data
  • From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: T.C. Hollingsworth
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Fedora 20 RC1 AMIs
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
  • From: nonamedotc
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: Richard Ryniker
• Re: F18 up to F20 -- how?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: F18 up to F20 -- how?
  • From: Beartooth
• Re: Very rough storage validation matrix draft
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Very rough storage validation matrix draft
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Failed attempt to fpaste UEFI failure data
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Fedora 21 and 22 trackers created
  • From: Dan Mossor
• Re: [Test-Announce] Important note regarding /root permissions for those who installed Fedora 20 pre-releases
  • From: cornel panceac
• Network Manager questions on F20RC1
  • From: Robert M. Albrecht
• Failed attempt to fpaste UEFI failure data
  • From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
• Re: Fedora 20 RC1 AMIs
  • From: Dennis Gilmore
• Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: Very rough storage validation matrix draft
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Very rough storage validation matrix draft
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: Very rough storage validation matrix draft
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: drago01
• Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Very rough storage validation matrix draft
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Very rough storage validation matrix draft
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Fedora 20 RC1 AMIs
  • From: Dennis Gilmore
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: Gavin Flower
• Fedora 21 and 22 trackers created
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: Rahul Sundaram
• Re: RC1 and UEFI
  • From: Bob Lightfoot
• Re: RC1 and UEFI
  • From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
• Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: RC1 and UEFI
  • From: Pete Travis
• Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• [Test-Announce] Important note regarding /root permissions for those who installed Fedora 20 pre-releases
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: drago01
• Re: yum rawhide failing....
  • From: poma
• Re: yum rawhide failing....
  • From: Kevin Martin
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
  • From: nonamedotc
• Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Fedora 20 RC1 AMIs
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Final Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!
  • From: Michał Piotrowski
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Final Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!
  • From: nonamedotc
• Re: yum rawhide failing....
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
  • From: nonamedotc
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Final Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!
  • From: Michał Piotrowski
• rawhide report: 20131213 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: Fedora 20 RC1 AMIs
  • From: Dennis Gilmore
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: Rejy M Cyriac
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: Rejy M Cyriac
• F-20 Branched report: 20131213 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: Gene Czarcinski
• Re: yum rawhide failing....
  • From: poma
• Re: RC1 and UEFI
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: yum rawhide failing....
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: RC1 and UEFI
  • From: poma
• Re: RC1 and UEFI
  • From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: poma
• [Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Final status is Go; GA release on Dec-17!
  • From: Jaroslav Reznik
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
• Re: yum rawhide failing....
  • From: poma
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: RC1/1.1 virtual tty switching broken
  • From: William F. Acker WB2FLW +1 303 722 7209
• Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
• Fedora 19 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Re: RC1/1.1 virtual tty switching broken
  • From: Felix Miata
• Re: RC1/1.1 virtual tty switching broken
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: RC1/1.1 virtual tty switching broken
  • From: Felix Miata
• Re: yum rawhide failing....
  • From: David
• Re: RC1/1.1 virtual tty switching broken
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: RC1 and UEFI
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
  • From: Adam Williamson
• yum rawhide failing....
  • From: Kevin Martin
• Re: RC1/1.1 virtual tty switching broken
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• RC1/1.1 virtual tty switching broken
  • From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
• Re: RC1 and UEFI
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: RC1 and UEFI
  • From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
• Re: RC1 and UEFI
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
  • From: Michael Cronenworth
• Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
  • From: Adam Pribyl
• Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
  • From: Michael Cronenworth
• Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
  • From: Adam Pribyl
• RE: Not able to install F20 over IPv6
  • From: Dan Mossor
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Final Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Final Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!
  • From: Gene Czarcinski
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• RC1 and UEFI
  • From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
• rawhide report: 20131212 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• F-20 Branched report: 20131212 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Fedora 20 RC1 AMIs
  • From: Dennis Gilmore
• en_US MC: bad chars on ttys
  • From: Felix Miata
• Re: [Test-Announce] 2013-12-11 @ 17:00 UTC - F20 Final Blocker Bug Review #5
  • From: Kamil Paral
• [Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Final Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!
  • From: Andre Robatino
• Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
  • From: Ahmad Samir
• Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
  • From: Michael Cronenworth
• Fedora 19 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Re: Fedora 20 Final status report
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Fedora 20 Final status report
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
  • From: nonamedotc
• bluetooth lovers, bluez needs karma
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: Heisenbug slightly ubstable?
  • From: Robert M. Albrecht
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Re: systemd-journald flush hangs system
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: systemd-journald flush hangs system
  • From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
• systemd-journald flush hangs system
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• rawhide report: 20131211 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• F-20 Branched report: 20131211 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• [Test-Announce] 2013-12-11 @ 17:00 UTC - F20 Final Blocker Bug Review #5
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Fedora 19 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: Heisenbug slightly ubstable?
  • From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
• Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: Heisenbug slightly ubstable?
  • From: flashl
• Heisenbug slightly ubstable?
  • From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
• Re: bugzilla problem
  • From: Cole Robinson
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• F-20 Branched report: 20131210 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• rawhide report: 20131210 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• [Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Final Go/No-Go Meeting #2, Thursday, December 12 @ 17:00 UTC
  • From: Jaroslav Reznik
• Re: Switch back to KDM?
  • From: Karel Volný
• Re: Who can close BZs?
  • From: Karel Volný
• 2013-12-09 - Fedora QA Meeting - recap
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Fedora 19 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Re: Not able to install F20 over IPv6
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: gnome-session-properties.desktop with NoDisplay=true
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: gnome-session-properties.desktop with NoDisplay=true
  • From: piruthiviraj natarajan
• gnome-session-properties.desktop with NoDisplay=true
  • From: Bruno Medeiros
• Re: Not able to install F20 over IPv6
  • From: Dennis Gilmore
• Re: systemd-208-9.fc20 package in f20 unsigned
  • From: Bruno Medeiros
• Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• nspr update to 4.10.2 in need of Karma form proven testers
  • From: Elio Maldonado Batiz
• F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Re: bugzilla problem
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: F20/Gnome3: How to add own plain colors for usage as desktop background?
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: bugzilla problem
  • From: Cole Robinson
• Re: Not able to install F20 over IPv6
  • From: A.J. Werkman
• bugzilla problem
  • From: Gene Czarcinski
• Re: Not able to install F20 over IPv6
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: [Test-Announce] 2013-12-09 @ 17:00 UTC (or directly after QA meeting) - F20 Final Blocker Bug Review #4.5
  • From: Jaroslav Reznik
• Re: Switch back to KDM?
  • From: poma
• Re: Switch back to KDM?
  • From: poma
• Re: Switch back to KDM?
  • From: Martin Briza
• Re: Switch back to KDM?
  • From: Martin Briza
• Re: Multi-head intel and nvidia configuration fails 100%
  • From: flashl
• rawhide report: 20131209 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: Switch back to KDM?
  • From: Jaroslav Reznik
• Re: Switch back to KDM?
  • From: poma
• F-20 Branched report: 20131209 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Re: Multi-head intel and nvidia configuration fails 100%
  • From: poma
• Re: Switch back to KDM?
  • From: Adam Pribyl
• F20/Gnome3: How to add own plain colors for usage as desktop background?
  • From: Joachim Backes
• Re: Switch back to KDM?
  • From: Jaroslav Reznik
• Re: Multi-head intel and nvidia configuration fails 100%
  • From: flashl
• Re: Not able to install F20 over IPv6
  • From: A.J. Werkman
• 2013-12-02 - Fedora QA Meeting - recap
  • From: Adam Williamson
• 2013-11-25 - Fedora QA Meeting - recap
  • From: Adam Williamson
• [Test-Announce] 2013-12-02 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting
  • From: Adam Williamson
• [Test-Announce] 2013-12-09 @ 17:00 UTC (or directly after QA meeting) - F20 Final Blocker Bug Review #4.5
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Multi-head intel and nvidia configuration fails 100%
  • From: poma
• Fedora 19 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Fedora 18 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• Re: Not able to install F20 over IPv6
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Multi-head intel and nvidia configuration fails 100%
  • From: flashl
• Re: fedup failure
  • From: Richard Vickery
• Re: fedup failure
  • From: Mateusz Marzantowicz
• Re: Switch back to KDM?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Fedora 20 updates-testing report
  • From: updates
• fedup failure
  • From: Richard Vickery
• Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
  • From: piruthiviraj natarajan
• Re: Multi-head intel and nvidia configuration fails 100%
  • From: flashl
• Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
  • From: Mateusz Marzantowicz
• Re: Multi-head intel and nvidia configuration fails 100%
  • From: Felix Miata
• Multi-head intel and nvidia configuration fails 100%
  • From: flashl
• F-20 Branched report: 20131208 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
  • From: Joachim Backes
• rawhide report: 20131208 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Fedora Easy Karma Recommendation
  • From: flashl
• Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
  • From: piruthiviraj natarajan
• Not able to install F20 over IPv6
  • From: A.J. Werkman
• Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
  • From: Joachim Backes
• Re: Switch back to KDM?
  • From: Christopher Meng
• Re: Switch back to KDM?
  • From: Ed Greshko
• Re: Switch back to KDM?
  • From: Christopher Meng
• Switch back to KDM?
  • From: Ed Greshko
• Re: slow mirror workaround?
  • From: Frank
• Re: slow mirror workaround?
  • From: Felix Miata