Red Hat Fedora Testing
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- 3.12 kernels get stuck midway and do not get to gdm
- Re: xserver fails to resume from suspend (f20)
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Enabling Updates repo in F20 install
- Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- rawhide report: 20131220 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Re: Very rough storage validation matrix draft
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- [Test-Announce] 2013-12-23 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting
- 2013-12-16 - Fedora QA Meeting - recap
- Fedora 19 updates-testing report
- Fedora 18 updates-testing report
- Fedora 20 updates-testing report
- Re: Recommended system requirements for f20 not sufficient?
- Re: Recommended system requirements for f20 not sufficient?
- Re: Recommended system requirements for f20 not sufficient?
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- From: Patrick O'Callaghan
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- From: Philippe LeCavalier
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: Sugar tweaked on desktop validation matrix
- Re: Recommended system requirements for f20 not sufficient?
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: Recommended system requirements for f20 not sufficient?
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: xserver fails to resume from suspend (f20)
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: xserver fails to resume from suspend (f20)
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
- Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
- Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
- rawhide report: 20131219 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Re: xserver fails to resume from suspend (f20)
- Re: Thoughts about Travis-CI integration
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: Rawhide heads up - password auth for ssh and selinux
- From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
- Fedora 18 updates-testing report
- Fedora 19 updates-testing report
- Fedora 20 updates-testing report
- Sugar tweaked on desktop validation matrix
- Rawhide heads up - password auth for ssh and selinux
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
- Re: xserver fails to resume from suspend (f20)
- Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
- Re: xserver fails to resume from suspend (f20)
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- From: Philippe LeCavalier
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- From: Philippe LeCavalier
- Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- [Test-Announce] Reminder: Fedora 18 end of life on 2014-01-14
- Re: [Fedora QA] #8: Checklist
- Re: [Fedora QA] #8: Checklist
- Re: [Fedora QA] #278: Joining the proven testers
- Re: [Fedora QA] #309: Request to join proven testers.
- Re: [Fedora QA] #299: Proven tester mentor request
- Re: [Fedora QA] #298: Proventester Mentor Request
- Re: [Fedora QA] #294: Want to become proventester - michalb
- Re: [Fedora QA] #293: proventester request
- Re: [Fedora QA] #281: Requesting a proven tester mentor
- Re: [Fedora QA] #229: asking to join the proven testers and requesting a mentor (was: Proven Tester group/mentor request denied due to defunct group.)
- Re: [Fedora QA] #268: asking to join the proven testers and requesting a mentor
- Re: [Fedora QA] #254: proventester request
- Re: [Fedora QA] #249: Proventester mentor request
- Re: [Fedora QA] #229: Proven Tester group/mentor request denied due to defunct group. (was: asking to join the proven testers and requesting a mentor)
- Re: xserver fails to resume from suspend (f20)
- Re: xserver fails to resume from suspend (f20)
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- AutoQA 0.8.5 Released
- Re: Recommended system requirements for f20 not sufficient?
- Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
- Re: Recommended system requirements for f20 not sufficient?
- Re: Karma request: LibreOffice
- Re: Recommended system requirements for f20 not sufficient?
- Re: RC1 and UEFI
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- From: Philippe LeCavalier
- Re: Thoughts about Travis-CI integration
- Re: Karma request: LibreOffice
- Re: Thoughts about Travis-CI integration
- Re: Thoughts about Travis-CI integration
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Thoughts about Travis-CI integration
- Recommended system requirements for f20 not sufficient?
- From: Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
- Re: Karma request: LibreOffice
- rawhide report: 20131218 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Re: Karma request: LibreOffice
- Re: xserver fails to resume from suspend (f20)
- xserver fails to resume from suspend (f20)
- Re: Karma request: LibreOffice
- From: Carlos Morel-Riquelme
- Re: Karma request: LibreOffice
- Re: Karma request: LibreOffice
- Re: Karma request: LibreOffice
- From: Carlos Morel-Riquelme
- Karma request: LibreOffice
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- [Test-Announce] PSA: Use fedup 0.8 for upgrades to Fedora 20! (was Re: Should a working fedup in Fedora N's stable repository be a release criterion for N+1?)
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: fedup f19-f20 success (sort of)
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: fedup f19-f20 success (sort of)
- Re: fedup f19-f20 success (sort of)
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- From: Philippe LeCavalier
- RE: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- rawhide report: 20131217 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- From: Philippe LeCavalier
- Re: Fedora 18 updates-testing report
- Re: Fedora 18 updates-testing report
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: Fedora 18 updates-testing report
- More on storage validation strategy (was: Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications)
- Re: Fedora 18 updates-testing report
- Re: fedup f19-f20 success (sort of)
- Re: Fedora 18 updates-testing report
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Fedora 18 updates-testing report
- Fedora 20 updates-testing report
- Fedora 19 updates-testing report
- fedup f19-f20 success (sort of)
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- From: Philippe LeCavalier
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- From: Philippe LeCavalier
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- From: Philippe LeCavalier
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- From: Philippe LeCavalier
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- Re: any report of fedup f19->f20?
- From: Philippe LeCavalier
- any report of fedup f19->f20?
- [Test-Announce] Announcing the release of Fedora 20.
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
- Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
- Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
- Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
- Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- RE: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
- Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: Draft combined checksums test case and sanity matrix
- Fedora 18 updates-testing report
- Fedora 19 updates-testing report
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
- Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Proposal: let's just use the FAS group already
- Re: Introduction to QA - or, howto become a tester
- RC1.1 at Caddyshack
- From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
- Introduction to QA - or, howto become a tester
- rawhide report: 20131216 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
- Fedora 20 updates-testing report
- Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
- Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
- Draft combined checksums test case and sanity matrix
- [Test-Announce] 2013-12-16 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting
- Re: gnome-session-properties.desktop with NoDisplay=true
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- Re: Avahi bollixing local network?
- From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
- Re: Avahi bollixing local network?
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- Avahi bollixing local network?
- From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
- rawhide report: 20131215 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
- Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
- Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
- Fedora 20 updates-testing report
- Fedora 18 updates-testing report
- Fedora 19 updates-testing report
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- Re: UEFI install on MBR partition scheme, was: Failed attempt to fpaste UEFI failure data
- Re: UEFI install on MBR partition scheme, was: Failed attempt to fpaste UEFI failure data
- Re: UEFI install on MBR partition scheme, was: Failed attempt to fpaste UEFI failure data
- From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
- Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- Re: UEFI install on MBR partition scheme, was: Failed attempt to fpaste UEFI failure data
- Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
- Re: UEFI install on MBR partition scheme, was: Failed attempt to fpaste UEFI failure data
- Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
- Re: UEFI install on MBR partition scheme, was: Failed attempt to fpaste UEFI failure data
- Re: Fedora 20 RC1 AMIs
- Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
- Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
- Re: F18 up to F20 -- how?
- Re: Failed attempt to fpaste UEFI failure data
- From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
- Re: Failed attempt to fpaste UEFI failure data
- Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
- From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
- Re: Failed attempt to fpaste UEFI failure data
- From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- Re: Fedora 20 RC1 AMIs
- Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- Re: F18 up to F20 -- how?
- Re: F18 up to F20 -- how?
- Re: Very rough storage validation matrix draft
- Re: Very rough storage validation matrix draft
- Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
- Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
- Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
- Re: Failed attempt to fpaste UEFI failure data
- Re: Fedora 21 and 22 trackers created
- Re: [Test-Announce] Important note regarding /root permissions for those who installed Fedora 20 pre-releases
- Network Manager questions on F20RC1
- Failed attempt to fpaste UEFI failure data
- From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: Fedora 20 RC1 AMIs
- Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
- Re: Very rough storage validation matrix draft
- Re: Very rough storage validation matrix draft
- Re: Very rough storage validation matrix draft
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
- Re: Very rough storage validation matrix draft
- Very rough storage validation matrix draft
- Re: Fedora 20 RC1 AMIs
- Fedora 20 updates-testing report
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- Fedora 21 and 22 trackers created
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- Re: RC1 and UEFI
- Re: RC1 and UEFI
- From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
- Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
- Re: RC1 and UEFI
- Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- [Test-Announce] Important note regarding /root permissions for those who installed Fedora 20 pre-releases
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- Re: yum rawhide failing....
- Re: yum rawhide failing....
- Fedora 20 updates-testing report
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
- Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
- Re: xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
- Re: Fedora 20 RC1 AMIs
- Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Final Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!
- Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Final Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!
- Re: yum rawhide failing....
- xfce does not remember saved sessions on Fedora 20
- Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Final Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!
- rawhide report: 20131213 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Re: Fedora 20 RC1 AMIs
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- F-20 Branched report: 20131213 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- Re: yum rawhide failing....
- Re: RC1 and UEFI
- Re: yum rawhide failing....
- Re: RC1 and UEFI
- Re: RC1 and UEFI
- From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- [Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Final status is Go; GA release on Dec-17!
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: yum rawhide failing....
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- Re: RC1/1.1 virtual tty switching broken
- From: William F. Acker WB2FLW +1 303 722 7209
- Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Fedora 19 updates-testing report
- Fedora 18 updates-testing report
- Re: RC1/1.1 virtual tty switching broken
- Re: RC1/1.1 virtual tty switching broken
- Re: RC1/1.1 virtual tty switching broken
- Re: yum rawhide failing....
- Re: RC1/1.1 virtual tty switching broken
- Re: RC1 and UEFI
- Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications
- yum rawhide failing....
- Re: RC1/1.1 virtual tty switching broken
- RC1/1.1 virtual tty switching broken
- From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
- Re: RC1 and UEFI
- Re: RC1 and UEFI
- From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
- Re: RC1 and UEFI
- Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
- Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
- RE: Not able to install F20 over IPv6
- Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Final Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!
- Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Final Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!
- Fedora 20 updates-testing report
- RC1 and UEFI
- From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
- rawhide report: 20131212 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- F-20 Branched report: 20131212 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- Fedora 20 RC1 AMIs
- en_US MC: bad chars on ttys
- Re: [Test-Announce] 2013-12-11 @ 17:00 UTC - F20 Final Blocker Bug Review #5
- [Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Final Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!
- Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
- Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Fedora 19 updates-testing report
- Fedora 18 updates-testing report
- Re: Fedora 20 Final status report
- Fedora 20 Final status report
- Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
- Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
- Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
- bluetooth lovers, bluez needs karma
- Re: Heisenbug slightly ubstable?
- Fedora 20 updates-testing report
- Re: systemd-journald flush hangs system
- Re: systemd-journald flush hangs system
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- systemd-journald flush hangs system
- rawhide report: 20131211 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- F-20 Branched report: 20131211 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- [Test-Announce] 2013-12-11 @ 17:00 UTC - F20 Final Blocker Bug Review #5
- Fedora 19 updates-testing report
- Fedora 18 updates-testing report
- Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
- Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
- Re: Heisenbug slightly ubstable?
- From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
- Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
- Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
- Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
- Re: Heisenbug slightly ubstable?
- Heisenbug slightly ubstable?
- From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
- Re: bugzilla problem
- Fedora 20 updates-testing report
- F-20 Branched report: 20131210 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- rawhide report: 20131210 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- [Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Final Go/No-Go Meeting #2, Thursday, December 12 @ 17:00 UTC
- Re: Switch back to KDM?
- Re: Who can close BZs?
- 2013-12-09 - Fedora QA Meeting - recap
- Fedora 19 updates-testing report
- Fedora 18 updates-testing report
- Re: Not able to install F20 over IPv6
- Re: gnome-session-properties.desktop with NoDisplay=true
- Re: gnome-session-properties.desktop with NoDisplay=true
- From: piruthiviraj natarajan
- gnome-session-properties.desktop with NoDisplay=true
- Re: Not able to install F20 over IPv6
- Re: systemd-208-9.fc20 package in f20 unsigned
- Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
- nspr update to 4.10.2 in need of Karma form proven testers
- From: Elio Maldonado Batiz
- F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
- Fedora 20 updates-testing report
- Re: bugzilla problem
- Re: F20/Gnome3: How to add own plain colors for usage as desktop background?
- Re: bugzilla problem
- Re: Not able to install F20 over IPv6
- bugzilla problem
- Re: Not able to install F20 over IPv6
- Re: [Test-Announce] 2013-12-09 @ 17:00 UTC (or directly after QA meeting) - F20 Final Blocker Bug Review #4.5
- Re: Switch back to KDM?
- Re: Switch back to KDM?
- Re: Switch back to KDM?
- Re: Switch back to KDM?
- Re: Multi-head intel and nvidia configuration fails 100%
- rawhide report: 20131209 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Re: Switch back to KDM?
- Re: Switch back to KDM?
- F-20 Branched report: 20131209 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- Re: Multi-head intel and nvidia configuration fails 100%
- Re: Switch back to KDM?
- F20/Gnome3: How to add own plain colors for usage as desktop background?
- Re: Switch back to KDM?
- Re: Multi-head intel and nvidia configuration fails 100%
- Re: Not able to install F20 over IPv6
- 2013-12-02 - Fedora QA Meeting - recap
- 2013-11-25 - Fedora QA Meeting - recap
- [Test-Announce] 2013-12-02 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting
- [Test-Announce] 2013-12-09 @ 17:00 UTC (or directly after QA meeting) - F20 Final Blocker Bug Review #4.5
- Re: Multi-head intel and nvidia configuration fails 100%
- Fedora 19 updates-testing report
- Fedora 18 updates-testing report
- Re: Not able to install F20 over IPv6
- Re: Multi-head intel and nvidia configuration fails 100%
- Re: fedup failure
- Re: fedup failure
- From: Mateusz Marzantowicz
- Re: Switch back to KDM?
- Fedora 20 updates-testing report
- fedup failure
- Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
- From: piruthiviraj natarajan
- Re: Multi-head intel and nvidia configuration fails 100%
- Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
- From: Mateusz Marzantowicz
- Re: Multi-head intel and nvidia configuration fails 100%
- Multi-head intel and nvidia configuration fails 100%
- F-20 Branched report: 20131208 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
- rawhide report: 20131208 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Fedora Easy Karma Recommendation
- Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
- From: piruthiviraj natarajan
- Not able to install F20 over IPv6
- Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
- Re: Switch back to KDM?
- Re: Switch back to KDM?
- Re: Switch back to KDM?
- Switch back to KDM?
- Re: slow mirror workaround?
- Re: slow mirror workaround?
- Re: systemd-208-9.fc20 package in f20 unsigned
- Fedora 20 updates-testing report
- Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
- From: piruthiviraj natarajan
- rawhide report: 20131207 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- F-20 Branched report: 20131207 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- Re: F20: Updates-testing mirrors inoperable?
- Re: F20: Updates-testing mirrors inoperable?
- Re: F20: Updates-testing mirrors inoperable?
- Re: systemd-208-9.fc20 package in f20 unsigned
- Re: New test case: SMB browsing
- Re: New test case: SMB browsing
- Re: New test case: SMB browsing
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Fedora 19 updates-testing report
- Fedora 18 updates-testing report
- RE: Who can close BZs?
- Re: Who can close BZs?
- Re: New test case: SMB browsing
- Re: deja-dup
- Re: deja-dup
- Re: New test case: SMB browsing
- Re: deja-dup
- Re: New test case: SMB browsing
- Re: New test case: SMB browsing
- New test case: SMB browsing
- Re: Nvidia driver choices
- Re: Re: Nvidia driver choices
- Re: springframework - there is no package for F20
- From: Mateusz Marzantowicz
- Re: Who can close BZs?
- Re: Who can close BZs?
- Re: Who can close BZs?
- Re: Nvidia driver choices
- Re: Nvidia driver choices
- Re: Updates in Fedora 20 TC5
- Re: how to fix updates in fedora 20? yum problem
- Re: No updates in Fedora TC5
- Re: Who can close BZs?
- Re: Who can close BZs?
- Re: No updates in Fedora TC5
- Re: how to fix updates in fedora 20? yum problem
- how to fix updates in fedora 20? yum problem
- Re: Updates in Fedora 20 TC5
- Nvidia driver choices
- Re: Who can close BZs?
- Fedora 20 updates-testing report
- Updates in Fedora 20 TC5
- Re: F20: Updates-testing mirrors inoperable?
- Re: F20: Updates-testing mirrors inoperable?
- Re: Who can close BZs?
- Re: Who can close BZs?
- systemd-208-9.fc20 package in f20 unsigned
- Update problems
- Re: No updates in Fedora TC5
- No updates in Fedora TC5
- Re: F20 KDE popups (SOLVED)
- Re: Who can close BZs?
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: Who can close BZs?
- Who can close BZs?
- Re: F20: Updates-testing mirrors inoperable?
- rawhide report: 20131206 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- F-20 Branched report: 20131206 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- Re: F20: Updates-testing mirrors inoperable?
- From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
- Re: F20: Updates-testing mirrors inoperable?
- Re: Fedora 20 Final blocker - Please add symfony packages.
- Re: F20: Updates-testing mirrors inoperable?
- Re: F20: Updates-testing mirrors inoperable?
- Re: F20: Updates-testing mirrors inoperable?
- Re: F20: Updates-testing mirrors inoperable?
- Re: deja-dup
- Re: F20: Updates-testing mirrors inoperable?
- Re: F20: Updates-testing mirrors inoperable?
- F20: Updates-testing mirrors inoperable?
- F20 KDE popups
- Re: deja-dup
- Re: deja-dup
- Re: deja-dup
- Re: deja-dup
- Re: deja-dup
- Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Final Test Compose 5 (TC5) Available Now!
- Re: TC5 at Caddyshack
- Re: springframework - there is no package for F20
- Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Final Test Compose 5 (TC5) Available Now!
- Re: Joining Fedora QA
- RE: [Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Final Test Compose 5 (TC5) Available Now!
- Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Final Test Compose 5 (TC5) Available Now!
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: deja-dup
- Re: deja-dup
- Re: TC5 at Caddyshack
- From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
- Re: springframework - there is no package for F20
- Re: TC5 at Caddyshack
- Re: Fedup F19 -> F20 always reboot to GDM
- Re: deja-dup
- TC5 at Caddyshack
- From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
- Re: deja-dup
- Fedora 20 TC5 AMIs
- Re: deja-dup
- deja-dup
- [Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Final Test Compose 5 (TC5) Available Now!
- Fedora 20 updates-testing report
- Re: packagekit msgs from syslogd
- Re: Joining Fedora QA
- Re: packagekit msgs from syslogd
- Re: Joining Fedora QA
- Re: Package not fedup'd
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: Package not fedup'd
- [Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Final to slip by one week
- Re: packagekit msgs from syslogd
- springframework - there is no package for F20
- From: Mateusz Marzantowicz
- Re: Joining Fedora QA
- rawhide report: 20131205 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- F-20 Branched report: 20131205 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- Re: packagekit msgs from syslogd
- Fedora 19 updates-testing report
- Fedora 18 updates-testing report
- Re: packagekit msgs from syslogd
- Fedora 20 updates-testing report
- Re: Package not fedup'd
- packagekit msgs from syslogd
- Disappearing bottom taskbar, Fedora 20 Beta
- Re: [Test-Announce] 2013-12-04 @ 17:00 UTC - F20 Final Blocker Bug Review #4 Minutes
- Re: Joining Fedora QA
- Joining Fedora QA
- Re: Package not fedup'd
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: Package not fedup'd
- Package not fedup'd
- rawhide report: 20131204 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- F-20 Branched report: 20131204 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- Re: F18 up to F20 -- how?
- [Test-Announce] 2013-12-04 @ 17:00 UTC - F20 Final Blocker Bug Review #4
- Re: F18 up to F20 -- how?
- Fedora 19 updates-testing report
- Fedora 18 updates-testing report
- Re: Boxes question & emulation
- Re: Boxes question & emulation
- Re: TC4 UEFI issues
- Re: F18 up to F20 -- how?
- Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Final Test Compose 4 (TC4) Available Now!
- From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
- Fedora 20 updates-testing report
- Boxes question & emulation
- Re: Printing problems
- Fedora 20 TC4 AMIs
- Re: Printing problems
- Re: Printing problems
- rawhide report: 20131203 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- [Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Final Test Compose 4 (TC4) Available Now!
- F-20 Branched report: 20131203 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- Re: Printing problems
- Fedora 19 updates-testing report
- Fedora 18 updates-testing report
- Re: F20 network configuration
- Re: installer swap computation
- installer swap computation
- Re: I think I broke blobby broke in rawhide
- Re: I think I broke blobby broke in rawhide
- I think I broke blobby broke in rawhide
- Fedora 20 updates-testing report
- Re: Printing problems
- From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
- Re: Printing problems
- Printing problems
- Re: [Test-Announce] 2013-12-02 @ 17:00 UTC (or directly after QA meeting) - F20 Final Blocker Bug Review #3.5 Minutes
- rawhide report: 20131202 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- Re: F20 network configuration
- Re: F18 up to F20 -- how?
- [Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Final Go/No-Go Meeting, Thursday, December 05 @ 17:00 UTC
- F-20 Branched report: 20131202 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- Re: F18 up to F20 -- how?
- Fedora 19 updates-testing report
- Fedora 18 updates-testing report
- Re: F20 network configuration
- [Test-Announce] 2013-12-02 @ 17:00 UTC (or directly after QA meeting) - F20 Final Blocker Bug Review #3.5
- [Test-Announce] 2013-12-02 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting
- Re: F20 network configuration
- Re: F20 network configuration
- Re: Fedup F19 -> F20 always reboot to GDM
- Re: Fedup F19 -> F20 always reboot to GDM
- Re: F18 up to F20 -- how?
- Re: F18 up to F20 -- how?
- F18 up to F20 -- how?
- Fedora 20 updates-testing report
- F20 network configuration
- rawhide report: 20131201 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- F-20 Branched report: 20131201 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- Fedora 19 updates-testing report
- Fedora 18 updates-testing report
- Re: F20 screen lock freezes
- Re: F20 http problem (was: systemd does not start Apache on my F20)
- F20 http problem (was: systemd does not start Apache on my F20)
- Re: systemd does not start Apache on my F20
- Re: systemd does not start Apache on my F20
- systemd does not start Apache on my F20
- rawhide report: 20131130 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
- F-20 Branched report: 20131130 changes
- From: Fedora Branched Report
- Re: Fedora 20 Final blocker bug status report (ACTIONS REQUIRED: karma from QA, fixes from devs)
- Fedora 20 updates-testing report
- Re: antlr-javadoc upgrade is broken in F20
- rawhide report: 20131129 changes
- From: Fedora Rawhide Report
[Index of Archives]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Photo Sharing]
[Yosemite Forum]
[KDE Users]