On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 10:50:37 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 14:29 +0000, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > > [obexfs] > > obexfs-0.12-7.fc20.i686 requires libopenobex.so.1 > > So, this is orphaned, and the code has now actually been rolled into > obexftp upstream. The build of obexftp I did yesterday includes the > obexfs and obexautofs utilities. > > What's the appropriate move here? Can we just add obsoletes/provides to > the obexftp package and then request that obexfs be retired? Alternatively, an "obexfs" subpackage could be built. Depending on how optional these tools are. As you say, it includes the same tools (obexfs, obexautofs). Do those tools do the same thing, or do they only use the same names? There are no manual pages for them. Information for RPM obexfs-0.12-7.fc20.x86_64.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=4254360 Information for RPM obexftp-0.24-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=4734383 obexftp contains the same Requires except for libpthread (obexfs depends on libphread). There's an empty /usr/share/doc/obexftp/html included. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
