On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 15:24 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 12:52 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > > > On þri 17.des 2013 04:26, John Dulaney wrote: > > > > > Ahoy, > > > > > > So, I am with Adam on this one (I'm not a mod?). I've been +1 for this > > > idea for quite some time now. > > > > > > Johann, I've been around for a long time, even longer than Adam, and I don't > > > remember the original purpose for the QA group; I do vaguely recall James > > > Laska telling me it had some purpose or other when I asked him about it (oddly > > > enough so I could be in more than the CLA group). > > > > Purpose and a fact of being "elitist" group which caused more harm > > then good in the QA community and what I'm worried about is that Adam > > is resurrecting it for other then purpose after he joined the WG's. > > > > If we agree it serves only the purpose to allow QA members to overcome > > other limitation in the project and we ensure that it will *only* > > serve and being used for that purpose I'm fine with resurrecting it > > but as soon as Adam or any other RH employee starts to mutilate it to > > serve it's corporate purpose we put it down. > > So it seems like in the end everyone was OK with the idea, so nirik has > set up the 'fedorabugs' inheritance and I've thrown a bunch of people in > the group to start the ball rolling. I'm sure I left quite a few people > out, I just sorta randomly looked through test@ and threw on every > regular I could see whose FAS name I happen to know. > > If you're not in the group yet but would like to be, do just go ahead > and apply - I've changed the group not to be invite-only any more - or > ping any of the admins or sponsors, with your FAS name: > > me > cmurf > johann > kparal > robatino > roshi (mike ruckman) > tflink > > for now, if anyone else wants to be a sponsor, just ask or something. > seven people should be enough to be going on with :) admins and > sponsors, do go ahead and throw anyone else who obviously ought to be in > the group into it. you can add people just by entering their FAS name > from the group page in FAS. > > as discussed, being in the group is not intended to be actually > necessary for any QA tasks, we're just going to have it to allow you to > get voting rights and fedorapeople space and as a > handy-but-probably-incomplete list of people involved with QA. no plans > to change any of our current tasks or processes to depend on group > membership in any way. oh, and group membership gives you 'editbugs' privs in Bugzilla, so you can do triage. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
