On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 20:40 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On mán 16.des 2013 20:23, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > How does that sound? Seems like something we can just get done already. > > > > It sounds like a bad plan revoke the QA group previously occupied and > manage by RH staff only and I'm strongly against that. > > So why are you planning to revert what we already had decide we did not > need. > > What's your end game with this move? "Let QA people have fedorapeople.org space", basically. danofsatx is the latest, but there've been three or four people recently who started contributing to QA and then found they wanted one of the things in Fedora you can get by being a member of a FAS group. Even though we don't really have a lot of use for the FAS group, Fedora as a whole is set up such that 'being a member of a FAS group' is a bar to entry for some things, so it seems like we're putting ourselves at a disadvantage by not putting our members in our FAS group. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
