Re: rawhide report: 20140113 changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 10:32 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> 
> >> obexftp contains the same Requires except for libpthread (obexfs
> >> depends on libphread). There's an empty /usr/share/doc/obexftp/html
> >> included.
> > 
> > They're the same tools, the obefxs source was moved into the obexftp
> > source tree upstream.
> > 
> > The thing I was unsure about was dealing with obsoleting an orphaned
> > package. Do I have to adopt the orphaned package first? Or can I just
> > file a request to kill that package?
> 
> I think that if obexftp package will "provide" a high enough version of
> obexfs then an update will automatically replace it and you will end up
> with obexftp only.  Also anything which has explicit dependencies on
> obexfs will not raise a fuss as after such replacement dependencies will
> be still satisfied.

Yes, I know that too. Let me play that tune again, Sam: I'm principally
asking the question of how the obexfs package should get retired.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux