Hi, folks. Just wanted to let the group know I added a section covering secretary duty to the blocker meeting SOP: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting#Secretary_Duty as this is fairly uncontroversial stuff just explaining an already-existing process I didn't think it needed drafting in advance - we're not setting policy here, just explaining how to do something that already happens. But as always, comments / questions / suggestions / complaints welcome! Especially from anyone else who's done secretary duty, or anyone who's been interested but intimidated. Those who've done it before, did I cover everything? Correctly? Those who've never done it but would quite like to, does this look like an understandable explanation? Would it give you the confidence to volunteer as the secretary at a blocker review meeting and feel like you could do a good job based on these instructions? Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
