On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 16:42 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 12:44 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > As I've said, if people are willing to actually go out and do that, then > > fine. Does desktop team actively curate the DVD-installed package set? > > And to play the counter-factual game: imagine there had been a bug > > analogous to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040922 in > > GNOME on the day of Go/No-Go meeting. Is the desktop SIG willing to take > > a stand and say 'yes, we should delay the release multiple weeks over > > Christmas if such a bug is discovered'? > > > > If so, then we can continue with the current criteria, though it would > > be ideal if desktop and KDE sigs could commit to helping with the > > testing. > > No, I take pretty much the same stance wrt. to the DVD: I pay attention > to the live image, and make sure it works. I don't think I've ever > downloaded or tried the DVD. I always found it very odd and awkward that > we hand out something at conferences and shows that nobody really pays > attention to. Well, then there's the problem. We can't have release criteria that say "we really stand behind the package sets installed from the DVD" if we don't. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
