On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 18:49 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> Hi >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >> >> >> Well, then there's the problem. We can't have release criteria >> that say >> "we really stand behind the package sets installed from the >> DVD" if we >> don't. >> >> >> That is true however the solution is not to weaken the release >> criteria but decide a) do we need the DVD anymore b) if we need it, >> whether there is anything against trimming down the default package >> sets to be consistent with what is included in the live images. With >> the new model, I think the right answer is to drop the DVD image >> entirely but b) is the minimum we should do. > > That requires will on the part of the desktop SIGs, though. QA is not > going to be responsible for this. My position is either the desktop SIGs > fix their stuff, or we will have to change the criteria as I proposed, > because what other choice do we have? Talk to FESCo ? Ask for them to remove the offending crap once we hit it? Or "if the app does not start and is not part of live kick it out". Its a one line change. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
