On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 05:13 -0500, Temlakos wrote: > Well, pots and kettles aside: > > I just ran the update. The only thing I'm curious about: > > 1. Fedup did not start any kind of GUI. It stayed in command-line prompt > mode. Actually that was an improvement: I could better watch its > progress. But I wasn't sure whether that was what the maintainers wanted > to achieve. There (still) isn't a GUI for fedup 'stage 1' (the pre-reboot part), so that much is normal. It would usually show a pulsing Fedora logo with a small progress bar during the post-reboot stages, but there may be cases where it doesn't. Have you modified your grub.cfg to disable graphical bootsplash, e.g. removing 'rhgb quiet'? I think the upgrade boot would inherit that change if you did, since fedup uses 'new-kernel-pkg' to create its grub entry. > 2. After I ran the suggested yum distro-sync cleanup command, my system > rolled fedup back to version 0.7, along with some fifteen other packages > that apparently were no up to the latest-and-greatest in the F20 stable > repos. AFAIK, Im not missing anything, but I'm not sure I would know > about that. Sometimes things in F(N-1) do get ahead of things in F(N), it's not entirely unknown. Especially around release time, because there are still more people on N-1. fedup 0.8 has not gone stable yet for F20, which sort of makes sense, because how would you test it? Most people aren't going to fedup to Rawhide :) (I have actually run a fedup to Rawhide and it worked for me, but I'm kind of an outlier.) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
