On Sat, 2013-12-14 at 14:26 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > I managed to identify the specific change to yum which made these > messages appear, and I think I know the attributes of the groups for > which it appears: non-environment groups that are listed as installed > in /var/lib/yum/groups/installed (also, possibly, through whatever other > mechanisms yum has for listing installed groups; like everyone else, I'm > having a lot of trouble grokking this yum-groups-as-objects thing), that > exist in comps, but have <uservisible> set to false. > > It at least appears the check that was added is being run in > circumstances where it wasn't expected to run. I don't know how many (if > any) other bugs there are with the logic of the check itself and > the /var/lib/yum/groups/installed file and the groups-as-objects change > and whatever other goddamned changes are going on here. One further note - I'm not actually sure if the suggested 'yum group mark remove <group>' is actually a particularly good idea, here, because the groups in question really do exist and you may well 'have them installed' (for whatever value of 'having a group installed' we're using this week), they're just hidden. I don't know precisely what 'group mark remove' *does*, I need to keep reading the docs, but I don't think I'd advise it off-hand, especially since the messages, I _think_, are harmless (just annoying). -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
