Many attempts to install f20 today -

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Today was the day to install f20 on my Lenovo x120e. I had two drives to work with: an old 320Gb HD and a new 240Gb SSD.

I thought I would be smart and hibernate my system with the current drive (f17). Don't know why I did not just poweroff. Something major went wrong and now that drive will not boot up. So building the new drive became imperative.

Short and long of it see bugzilla reports:  1006304, 1033749, & 1046482.

I am up and running with i386 on the 320Gb HD. I was using x86_64 with f17. At least I have an installation and I can access my emails and figure out how to get x86_64 on the SSD.

The problems writing the bootloader MAY be due to USB problems I have observed on this system. ~5 months ago, I was no longer able to write USB sticks or SD cards (in the SD slot). I have been able to write to USB HD and USB CD and DVD. Or at least it seems so.

How can I determine if I really do have USB problems and have to buy new hardware?

With all the attempts to install, I spent a lot of time with the installation and have a couple of small strange behaviours to report:

In setting the location from New York to Detroit, if I did not get Detroit the 1st time or even when back to try and select something else, I lost the down arrow to scroll beyond the 'a's. I had to type Detroit in on the location bar. This was consistant behaviour. Had enough times doing this step.

If I selected my local repo, Updates became not an option. Regardless if I used the DVD install (i386 and x86_64) or the netinstal (only tried x86_64), consistantly this became greyed out. I could not provide the URL for where I have my local updates repo. It did not matter if I added repo=url to the boot line, or did it in the GUI. The moment I selected my own http URL, I lost updates.

As far as adding repo= to the boot line, i386 and x86_64 work differently! But I suspect you know that. tab with i386 and 'e' with x86_64.

Sometimes when I selected LVM for the partitioning, the LVM partition name would be 'fedora_19'. I left it like that in this install that finally worked and here is what df has to say for itself:

$ df -h
Filesystem                          Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/fedora_19-root           29G  4.8G   23G  18% /
devtmpfs                            1.3G     0  1.3G   0% /dev
tmpfs                               1.3G  164K  1.3G   1% /dev/shm
tmpfs                               1.3G 1016K  1.3G   1% /run
tmpfs                               1.3G     0  1.3G   0% /sys/fs/cgroup
tmpfs                               1.3G   44K  1.3G   1% /tmp
/dev/sda1                           477M   96M  352M  22% /boot
/dev/mapper/fedora_19-home          257G   32G  212G  14% /home

Some times it used the host name. Depended on what steps I took to get to setting up the LVM partition.

In summary of what is important:

Why have my installs to the SSD failed (writing bootloader).
Why can I not provide my updates URL.

thank you


--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux