Re: Proposed validation test case: root on LVM thinp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I didn't really mean to preclude the use of a minimal package set, I'm
> just trying to exclude the problems we've been having whereby the test
> cases and criteria are kind of getting 'gamed' with odd choices =) I'll
> see if I can find a happy medium...

I think a general sentence like this could work fine:
"Please try not to adjust any installation settings that could make a potential bug in the tested area go unnoticed."

Which means, if you combine too many stuff, maybe it'll blow up and you'll never know why, or maybe it will behave quite differently than in 'expected/usual' case.

I don't think we need to counter criteria gaming inside test cases. We have the meetings to decide that.
-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux