On Mon, 06 Jan 2014 21:27:44 +0000 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: <snip> > >> If we want to free time to work on stuff like this Anaconda release > >> cycle and testing must be finished before alpha or dealt with after > >> beta. > > Sure, that could end up being useful but it's but one piece of the > > puzzle. It looks like 2014 is going to be an interesting year with > > all the potential changes coming up. Summing all that up as > > "everything would be OK if we could just change anaconda's > > dev/release cycle" is a bit simplistic and a touch naive. > > To you it might seem naive to be it's a key factor since once the > needed changes have been made to Anaconda's release cycle we will see > how much free resources we have and where we can allocate those > resources like to what extend we need push work into their relevant > sub-community and what's needed for the QA community members role > ( testing/triaging ) etc. I didn't say that the proposal itself was naive - just the idea that if we changed the anaconda dev/release cycle, everything would suddenly be better and all of our problems would be addressed. Tim
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
