On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 22:16 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On mán 16.des 2013 22:10, Adam Williamson wrote: > > I'm not playing any game...in fact, the thing that prompted me to > > finally write this email was Dan asking on #fedora-qa if there was a FAS > > group we could put him in so he'd have fedorapeople space! > > The limit that group entirely with providing him and others with that. Sorry? I can't parse that. If you mean "Then limit that group entirely with providing him and others with that." - well, that's already what we'd be doing. The proposal isn't to make the QA group required for anything at all in relation to QA. The proposal is just to add all the QA people we can to the group, and in the future, when new people join, add them too. And make it inherit fedorabugs (or make fedorabugs inherit it, whichever way around it goes) so QA people get editbugs privileges. And then...nothing. That's it. We don't actually use the group for anything in QA, or anything. That's not what I'm suggesting. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
