On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 21:35 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On mán 16.des 2013 21:00, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Even though we don't really have a lot of use for the FAS group, > > None what so ever. Actually, there is one, I forgot to mention it: we can have 'qa' inherit 'fedorabugs', which would give all QA members 'editbugs' privileges. > > Fedora > > as a whole is set up such that 'being a member of a FAS group' is a bar > > to entry for some things, > > Not with us and never should be. We're part of Fedora, not some kind of independent entity. Having fedorapeople space is a useful thing for QA members. Being able to vote in elections is a useful thing for QA members. Currently, you have to find some other way to get yourself added to a group in order to get those things, which means you have to apply to some other group or find someone with moderator privileges for a group and persuade them to add you, just so you can 'game the system'. Why is it a bad thing if we just put QA people in the QA group so they can have access to those things? > > so it seems like we're putting ourselves at a > > disadvantage by not putting our members in our FAS group. > > No we are not and we are putting ourselves in advantage by not doing so. Could you please explain what advantage we're giving ourselves by not putting people in a FAS group? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
