On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 15:13 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 01/06/2014 02:52 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > Hi Fedora test and QA folks! I posted a (kind of long) message on Fedora devel > > with some thoughts about the direction of the project in the next year. A > > lot of it directly affects -- and is affected by, of course -- Fedora QA, > > and the whole third section about increased automation is basically all > > about QA/QE and release engineering. > > Beside hyperkitty and or just the entire "virtual flock" idea of yours > being far from product ready and not suitable as somekind of community > infrastructure as well as the entire concept of WG being broken ( with > the exception of the base WG which work will be beneficial when that > effort goes south ) > > We are 30 people tops ( 20 more likely ) contributing on even bases with > maybe what couple of hours to spare per week and of those 20 there are > what <10 RH employees so as you can see we dont have any resources to do > any ( wg or automation ) for that glorious future of yours and any kind > of output from the WG's but by all means continue to dream. I don't want to be quite as negative as Johann, but yeah, that third section of your email is...um...ambitious. I'm sure you know this, but to have it on the public record: we are a long, long, long, long, LONG way away from that vision. I'll be happy if we just have a properly working test harness in place this year. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
