IETF Discussion

Date Index

[Prev Page][Next Page]

Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-04.txt> (Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Profile for 3GPP Mobile Devices) to Informational RFC, (continued)
RE: Protocol Action: 'RADIUS Option for DHCPv6 Relay Agent' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-radius-opt-14.txt), ATEC
Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Måns Nilsson
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, John Levine
  - Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Måns Nilsson
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Sullivan
  - Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, HLS
  - Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Pete Resnick
    - Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Pete Resnick
      - Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Sullivan
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Mark Andrews
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Sullivan
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Mark Andrews
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Olafur Gudmundsson
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Hector Santos
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Jelte Jansen
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Olafur Gudmundsson
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, John Levine
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Jelte Jansen
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, John Levine
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, S Moonesamy
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Jelte Jansen
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, John R Levine
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Jelte Jansen
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, John R Levine
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Jelte Jansen
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Jelte Jansen
        
        Overloaded TXT harmful (was" Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard), John C Klensin
    - SPF TYPE support, Hector Santos
      - Re: SPF TYPE support, Pete Resnick
      - Re: SPF TYPE support, S Moonesamy
        
        Re: SPF TYPE support, Måns Nilsson
        
        Re: SPF TYPE support, Dave Crocker
        
        Re: [spfbis] SPF TYPE support, Hector Santos
        
        Re: [spfbis] SPF TYPE support, S Moonesamy
      - Re: [spfbis] SPF TYPE support, Ted Lemon
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, S Moonesamy
  - Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Hector Santos
    - Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, S Moonesamy
      - Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Måns Nilsson
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Mark Andrews
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Mark Andrews
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Mark Andrews
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Mark Andrews
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, David Conrad
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Måns Nilsson
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Måns Nilsson
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Scott Kitterman
        
        Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Måns Nilsson
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Dotzero
- Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard, Pete Resnick
Re: [Dime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dime-realm-based-redirect-11.txt> (Realm-Based Redirection In Diameter) to Proposed Standard, Stefan Winter
- RE: [Dime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dime-realm-based-redirect-11.txt> (Realm-Based Redirection In Diameter) to Proposed Standard, lionel.morand
  - Re: [Dime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dime-realm-based-redirect-11.txt> (Realm-Based Redirection In Diameter) to Proposed Standard, Stefan Winter
    - RE: [Dime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dime-realm-based-redirect-11.txt> (Realm-Based Redirection In Diameter) to Proposed Standard, lionel.morand
      - Re: [Dime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dime-realm-based-redirect-11.txt> (Realm-Based Redirection In Diameter) to Proposed Standard, Stefan Winter
        
        RE: [Dime] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dime-realm-based-redirect-11.txt> (Realm-Based Redirection In Diameter) to Proposed Standard, lionel.morand
Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs-10, Black, David
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs-10, Eric McMurry
  - RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs-10, Black, David
    - Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs-10, Ben Campbell
IAOC Chair, The IAOC
Anyone having trouble submitting I-Ds?, Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: Anyone having trouble submitting I-Ds?, Benjamin Kaduk
  - Re: Anyone having trouble submitting I-Ds?, Phillip Hallam-Baker
    - Re: Anyone having trouble submitting I-Ds?, John Levine
      - Re: Anyone having trouble submitting I-Ds?, Robert Sparks
Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-karp-ops-model-07, Ben Campbell
- Message not available
  - Re: Fwd: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-karp-ops-model-07, Sam Hartman
    - Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-karp-ops-model-07, Ben Campbell
      - Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-karp-ops-model-07, Sam Hartman
Re: [karp] IANA policy for draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08, Sam Hartman
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [karp] IANA policy for draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08, Sam Hartman
  - RE: [karp] IANA policy for draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08, Black, David
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-model-07.txt> (A Model for Reputation Reporting) to Informational RFC, SM
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-model-07.txt> (A Model for Reputation Reporting) to Informational RFC, Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-media-type-10.txt> (A Media Type for Reputation Interchange) to Proposed Standard, SM
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-media-type-10.txt> (A Media Type for Reputation Interchange) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy
  - Message not available
    - Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-media-type-10.txt> (A Media Type for Reputation Interchange) to Proposed Standard, SM
      - Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-media-type-10.txt> (A Media Type for Reputation Interchange) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-08.txt> (A Reputation Response Set for Email Identifiers) to Proposed Standard, SM
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-08.txt> (A Reputation Response Set for Email Identifiers) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard, SM
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy
  - Message not available
    - Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard, SM
      - Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy
        
        Message not available
        
        Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard, SM
        
        Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy
        
        Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Bob Braden
        
        Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin
        
        Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-query-http-09.txt> (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Hector Santos
[no subject], Unknown
Call for Review of draft-rfced-rfcxx00-retired, "List of Internet Official Protocol Standards: Replaced by an Online Database", IAB Chair
- Re: Call for Review of draft-rfced-rfcxx00-retired, "List of Internet Official Protocol Standards: Replaced by an Online Database", SM
cbor-05 (was: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard), Carsten Bormann
- High-volume benchmark (was Re: [apps-discuss] cbor-05), Pierre Thierry
  - Re: High-volume benchmark (was Re: [apps-discuss] cbor-05), Carsten Bormann
RE: RFC 6980 on Security Implications of IPv6 Fragmentation with IPv6 Neighbor Discovery, Stephen Nadas
Last Call: <draft-petithuguenin-behave-turn-uris-05.txt> (Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Uniform Resource Identifiers) to Proposed, Graham Klyne
Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Graham Klyne
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, S Moonesamy
  - Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Harald Alvestrand
  - Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Graham Klyne
    - Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Harald Alvestrand
      - Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Hadriel Kaplan
        
        Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Graham Klyne
      - Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Graham Klyne
        
        Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Harald Alvestrand
        
        Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Peter Saint-Andre
        
        Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Hadriel Kaplan
  - Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard, Marc Petit-Huguenin
Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, IETF Administrative Director
- Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, Riccardo Bernardini
  - Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, Melinda Shore
    - Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, Ted Lemon
      - Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, John Levine
  - Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, John Levine
    - Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, Riccardo Bernardini
    - Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, Ted Lemon
      - Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFCPublisher, t.p.
  - Re: [rfc-i] Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, Ray Pelletier
- Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, Ray Pelletier
  - Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, Sandy Ginoza
    - Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, David Harrington
  - Message not available
    - Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, Jeffrey Hutzelman
      - Re: [IAOC] Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, Russ Housley
        
        Re: [rfc-i] [IAOC] Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, Nico Williams
      - Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, Bert Wijnen (IETF)
  - Re: [IAB] Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, Eliot Lear
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher, Adrian Farrel
NOMS 2014 Call for Papers, Thomas Nadeau
Data collection for remote participation, Vinayak Hegde
- Re: Data collection for remote participation, Alejandro Acosta
  - Re: Data collection for remote participation, Vinayak Hegde
    - Re: Data collection for remote participation, Alejandro Acosta
- Re: Data collection for remote participation, Janet P Gunn
  - Re: Data collection for remote participation, Vinayak Hegde
    - Re: Data collection for remote participation, Janet P Gunn
      - Re: Data collection for remote participation, John Leslie
        
        Radical Solution for remote participants, Douglas Otis
        
        Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, Dave Cridland
        
        Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, John Leslie
        
        Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, John C Klensin
        
        Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, Hadriel Kaplan
        
        Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, Arturo Servin
        
        Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, Hadriel Kaplan
        
        Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, Janet P Gunn
        
        Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, Janet P Gunn
        
        Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, Mark Nottingham
        
        Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, Joel M. Halpern
        
        Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, John C Klensin
        
        Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, Keith Moore
        
        Re: Radical Solution for remote participants, Andy Bierman
        
        Charging remote participants, Hadriel Kaplan
        
        Re: Charging remote participants, Janet P Gunn
        
        Re: Charging remote participants, Keith Moore
        
        Re: Charging remote participants, Turchanyi Geza
        
        Re: Charging remote participants, Arturo Servin
        
        Re: Charging remote participants, Hadriel Kaplan
        
        Re: Charging remote participants, Keith Moore
        
        Re: Charging remote participants, Hadriel Kaplan
        
        Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), SM
        
        Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), Vinayak Hegde
        
        Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), Hadriel Kaplan
        
        Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), John C Klensin
        
        Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), Hadriel Kaplan
        
        Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), John Levine
        
        Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), Phillip Hallam-Baker
        
        Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), SM
        
        Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), John C Klensin
        
        Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), SM
        
        Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), John C Klensin
        
        Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), Scott Kitterman
        
        Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), Hadriel Kaplan
        
        Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), Scott Kitterman
        
        Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants), Vinayak Hegde
        
        Re: Academic and open source rate, Arturo Servin
        
        Re: Academic and open source rate, SM
        
        Re: Academic and open source rate, Phillip Hallam-Baker
        
        Re: Charging remote participants, Carlos M. Martinez
        
        Re: Charging remote participants, John C Klensin
        
        Re: Charging remote participants, Melinda Shore
        
        Re: Charging remote participants, Hadriel Kaplan
        
        Re: Charging remote participants, Henning Schulzrinne
        
        Re: Charging remote participants, Mark Baugher (mbaugher)
        
        Re: Charging remote participants, Henning Schulzrinne
        
        Re: Charging remote participants, Stephen Farrell
        
        Re: Charging remote participants, Hadriel Kaplan
        
        Re: Charging remote participants, John C Klensin
        
        Re: Charging remote participants, Hadriel Kaplan
        
        Re: Charging remote participants, David Morris
        
        Re: Charging remote participants, Janet P Gunn
        
        Re: Charging remote participants, Dave Crocker
        
        Re: Charging remote participants, Hadriel Kaplan
        
        Re: Charging remote participants, Abdussalam Baryun
        
        Re: Charging remote participants, Hadriel Kaplan
        
        Re: Charging remote participants, Janet P Gunn
        
        Re: Charging remote participants, Mikael Abrahamsson
        
        Re: Charging remote participants, Dave Aronson
        
        Re: Charging remote participants, Randy Presuhn
        
        Re: Charging remote participants, Janet P Gunn
        
        Re: Charging remote participants, Janet P Gunn
        
        Re: Charging remote participants, Arturo Servin
- Message not available
  - Re: Data collection for remote participation, S Moonesamy
- Message not available
  - Re: Charging remote participants, Scott Kitterman
Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-05, Peter Yee
Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Yaron Sheffer
- Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Carsten Bormann
  - Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker
    - Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Ted Lemon
      - Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin
    - Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard, Eliot Lear
TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Martin Sustrik
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Wesley Eddy
  - Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Martin Sustrik
  - Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Joe Touch
    - Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Wesley Eddy
      - Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Martin Sustrik
        
        Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Joe Touch
        
        Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Martin Sustrik
        
        Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Joe Touch
        
        Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Martin Sustrik
        
        Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Joe Touch
        
        Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Martin Sustrik
        
        Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Joe Touch
        
        Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Martin Sustrik
        
        Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Joe Touch
        
        Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Joe Touch
      - Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Bob Braden
        
        Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Martin Sustrik
    - Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Martin Sustrik
      - Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status, Joe Touch
Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08, Black, David
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08, Jari Arkko
- Re: [karp] IANA policy for draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08, Sam Hartman
  - RE: [karp] IANA policy for draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08, Black, David
    - Re: [karp] IANA policy for draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08, Carter Bullard
- Re: [karp] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08, Sam Hartman
  - Re: [karp] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08, Stephen Kent
    - RE: [karp] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08, Uma Chunduri
  - RE: [karp] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08, Black, David
Gen-ART review of draft-eastlake-rfc5342bis-04, Black, David
Re: [apps-discuss] Gen-ART review of draft-bormann-cbor-04, Carsten Bormann
- Re: [apps-discuss] Gen-ART review of draft-bormann-cbor-04, Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [apps-discuss] Gen-ART review of draft-bormann-cbor-04, Tony Finch
  - Re: [apps-discuss] Gen-ART review of draft-bormann-cbor-04, Carsten Bormann
  - Re: [apps-discuss] Gen-ART review of draft-bormann-cbor-04, Paul Hoffman
  - Re: [apps-discuss] Gen-ART review of draft-bormann-cbor-04, Carsten Bormann
    - Re: [apps-discuss] Gen-ART review of draft-bormann-cbor-04, Phillip Hallam-Baker
Models of building platform standards, Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oob-pubkey-09.txt> (Out-of-Band Public Key Validation for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oob-pubkey-09.txt> (Out-of-Band Public Key Validation for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, Hannes Tschofenig
Microphone protocol, Marc Petit-Huguenin
Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Aaron Yi DING
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Joe Abley
  - Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Melinda Shore
    - Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Keith Moore
    - Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Phillip Hallam-Baker
  - Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Doug Barton
Re: [Trustees] The Trust Agreement, Noel Chiappa
- Re: [Trustees] The Trust Agreement, Brian E Carpenter
Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-allen-dispatch-imei-urn-as-instanceid-10, Roni Even
- RE: Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-allen-dispatch-imei-urn-as-instanceid-10, Andrew Allen
Re: procedural question with remote participation, Aaron Yi DING
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Aaron Yi DING
  - Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation, Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Aaron Yi DING
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Aaron Yi DING
  - Re: procedural question with remote participation, Michael Richardson
  - Re: procedural question with remote participation, Joe Abley
    - Re: procedural question with remote participation, Eliot Lear
      - Re: procedural question with remote participation, Douglas Otis
    - Re: procedural question with remote participation, Hadriel Kaplan
      - Re: procedural question with remote participation, Joe Abley
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, Aaron Yi DING
  - Re: procedural question with remote participation, Joe Abley
Speaking of VAT, John Levine
- Re: Speaking of VAT, Yoav Nir
  - Re: Speaking of VAT, John R Levine
    - Re: Speaking of VAT, Ray Pelletier
    - Re: Speaking of VAT, t.p.
      - Re: Speaking of VAT, John Levine
- Re: Speaking of VAT, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo
- Re: Speaking of VAT, Carsten Bormann
  - Re: Speaking of VAT, Ray Pelletier
RPS Accessibility, Paul Aitken
- Re: RPS Accessibility, spromano
- Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Dan York
  - Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Dave Crocker
    - Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Michael Richardson
      - Re: RPS Accessibility, Brian Rosen
        
        Re: RPS Accessibility, Michael Richardson
        
        RE: RPS Accessibility, Robin Uyeshiro
      - Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Ted Lemon
    - Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Joe Abley
      - Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Paul Aitken
    - Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Ted Lemon
      - Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, John Levine
      - Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Randy Bush
        
        Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, John Levine
        
        Faraday cages..., Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Faraday cages..., Chris Elliott
        
        Re: Faraday cages..., Scott Brim
        
        Re: Faraday cages..., Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Faraday cages..., Joe Abley
        
        Re: Faraday cages..., Scott Kitterman
        
        Re: Faraday cages..., Scott Brim
        
        Re: Faraday cages..., Henning Schulzrinne
        
        Re: Faraday cages..., Ole Jacobsen
        
        Re: Faraday cages..., Ted Lemon
        
        RE: Faraday cages..., Christian Huitema
        
        RE: Faraday cages..., John R Levine
        
        Re: Faraday cages..., Phillip Hallam-Baker
        
        Re: Faraday cages..., Ted Lemon
        
        RE: Faraday cages..., Christian Huitema
        
        Re: Faraday cages..., Phillip Hallam-Baker
        
        Re: Faraday cages..., Keith Moore
        
        Re: Faraday cages..., George Michaelson
        
        Re: Faraday cages..., Phillip Hallam-Baker
        
        Re: Faraday cages..., George Michaelson
        
        Re: Faraday cages..., Keith Moore
        
        Re: Faraday cages..., George Michaelson
        
        Re: Faraday cages..., Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Faraday cages..., Keith Moore
        
        Re: Faraday cages..., Scott Kitterman
        
        Re: Faraday cages..., Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Faraday cages..., Mark Andrews
        
        Re: Faraday cages..., Henning Schulzrinne
        
        Re: Faraday cages..., Christopher Morrow
      - Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Paul Aitken
        
        Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Ted Lemon
    - Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Ted Lemon
      - Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Dave Crocker
      - Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Hadriel Kaplan
        
        Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Doug Barton
        
        Re: RPS Accessibility, Doug Barton
        
        Re: RPS Accessibility, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Martin Rex
        
        Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Hadriel Kaplan
  - Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Henning Schulzrinne
    - Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Riccardo Bernardini
      - Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Keith Moore
      - Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, Hadriel Kaplan
      - Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility, manning bill
Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation, Olle E. Johansson
- Re: procedural question with remote participation, John C Klensin
  - Re: procedural question with remote participation, Michael Richardson
    - Re: procedural question with remote participation, John C Klensin
      - Re: procedural question with remote participation, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: procedural question with remote participation, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: procedural question with remote participation, Scott Brim
        
        Re: procedural question with remote participation, Hadriel Kaplan
        
        Re: procedural question with remote participation, Stephen Farrell
        
        Re: procedural question with remote participation, Melinda Shore
        
        Re: procedural question with remote participation, Keith Moore
        
        Re: procedural question with remote participation, Andrew Feren
        
        Re: procedural question with remote participation, Keith Moore
        
        Re: procedural question with remote participation, Andrew Feren
        
        Re: procedural question with remote participation, John C Klensin
        
        Re: procedural question with remote participation, Scott Brim
        
        Re: procedural question with remote participation, Dave Crocker
        
        Re: procedural question with remote participation, Michael Richardson
        
        Re: procedural question with remote participation, Hadriel Kaplan
        
        Re: procedural question with remote participation, Hadriel Kaplan
      - Re: procedural question with remote participation, Hadriel Kaplan
        
        Re: procedural question with remote participation, Spencer Dawkins
        
        Re: procedural question with remote participation, Hadriel Kaplan
        
        Re: procedural question with remote participation, Spencer Dawkins
        
        Re: procedural question with remote participation, Scott Brim
        
        Re: procedural question with remote participation, Michael Richardson
        
        Re: procedural question with remote participation, John C Klensin
        
        Re: procedural question with remote participation, James Polk
        
        Re: procedural question with remote participation, Stephen Farrell
        
        Re: procedural question with remote participation, John C Klensin
        
        Re: procedural question with remote participation, SM
        
        Re: procedural question with remote participation, Hadriel Kaplan
      - Re: procedural question with remote participation, John Curran
  - Re: procedural question with remote participation, Hadriel Kaplan
    - Re: procedural question with remote participation, Peter Saint-Andre
      - Re: procedural question with remote participation, Dave Cridland
        
        Re: procedural question with remote participation, Stephen Farrell
        
        Re: procedural question with remote participation, Hadriel Kaplan
        
        Re: procedural question with remote participation, Scott Brim
        
        Re: procedural question with remote participation, Yoav Nir
        
        Re: procedural question with remote participation, Scott Brim
Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Chris Griffiths
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Olaf Kolkman
  - Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Paul Hoffman
    - Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Tobias Gondrom
  - Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Chris Griffiths
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, t.p.
  - Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Chris Griffiths
    - Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Brian E Carpenter
      - Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Paul Hoffman
        
        Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Doug Barton
        
        Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Paul Hoffman
        
        Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Jorge Contreras
        
        Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Paul Hoffman
        
        Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Doug Barton
        
        Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, John Levine
        
        Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, John C Klensin
        
        Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Yoav Nir
        
        Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, John Levine
- Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, SM
  - Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Chris Griffiths
    - Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Chris Griffiths
      - RE: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Adrian Farrel
        
        Re: Community Feedback: IETF Trust Agreement Issues, Chris Griffiths
RE: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx), Adrian Farrel
- Re: [IETF] RE: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx), Warren Kumari
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx), Scott Brim
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx), Aaron Yi DING
The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx), Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx), Heasley
  - Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx), Andy Bierman
  - Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx), Ole Jacobsen (ole)
    - Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx), Roger Jørgensen
      - Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx), Loa Andersson
        
        Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx), John Levine
        
        Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx), Melinda Shore
        
        Message not available
        
        Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx), Tim Chown
        
        Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx), John C Klensin
        
        Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx), Jari Arkko
        
        Message not available
        
        Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx), Abdussalam Baryun
        
        Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx), Scott Brim
        
        Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx), Hadriel Kaplan
- Message not available
  - The Friday Report, S Moonesamy
Thanks, and tools work clarification, Henrik Levkowetz
Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Adam Roach
- Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Scott Brim
  - Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Brian E Carpenter
  - Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Lou Berger
  - Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Olle E. Johansson
    - Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Yoav Nir
      - Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Yoav Nir
        
        Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), John C Klensin
- Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Abdussalam Baryun
  - Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), Scott Brim
  - RE: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation), l.wood
Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Eggert, Lars
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Carsten Bormann
  - Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Scott Brim
    - Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
      - Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Eggert, Lars
        
        Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
        
        Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Andrew Allen
        
        Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Mary Barnes
        
        Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Ole Jacobsen
        
        RE: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Adrian Farrel
        
        Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Roberto Peon
        
        Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Roberto Peon
        
        Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Mary Barnes
      - Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Ted Lemon
        
        AW: Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
      - Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, John Levine
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Yoav Nir
  - Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Henning Schulzrinne
  - Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Martin Thomson
    - Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Yoav Nir
      - Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Keith Moore
    - Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Michael Richardson
      - Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Janet P Gunn
        
        Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Arturo Servin
      - Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, John Levine
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Russ Housley
  - Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Eggert, Lars
    - Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Keith Moore
  - Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Pat Thaler
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, joel jaeggli
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Ted Lemon
- Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Livingood, Jason
  - Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Jari Arkko
  - Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Mary Barnes
    - Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Scott Brim
    - Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Randall Gellens
      - Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, John C Klensin
    - Message not available
      - Re: Berlin was awesome, let's come again, Ulrich Herberg

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IP Storage] [Linux SCTP] [IETF]

Powered by Linux