TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: IETF-Discussion <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status
From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 07:43:23 +0200
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/3.1.16

Hi all,

Does anyone have any idea how widely is TCPMUX (RFC 1078) protocol used?Is it the case that there are inetd daemons in TCPMUX mode runningeverywhere, or can it be rather considered a dead protocol?

Specifically, if I implement a new TCPMUX daemon how likely I am toclash with an existing TCPMUX daemon listening on port 1?


Martin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status
  - From: Wesley Eddy

Prev by Date: Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard
Next by Date: Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08
Next by thread: Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]