Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-repute-media-type-10.txt> (A Media Type for Reputation Interchange) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Murray,
At 00:05 21-08-2013, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
As alluded to above, there can be quite a bit of information needed for an application to be defined beyond the defaults assumed when a name is registered. There didn't seem to be any need to require such definition to be in an IETF document, but it also seems as though more information than what's needed with just FCFS or DE or the other lesser rules is appropriate either.

I'll suggest Expert Review here as it is a lesser barrier. I'll defer to you on this.

Regards,
-sm




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]