Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



My conclusion is that a statement that nobody queries for it is false.

   Patrik

On 21 aug 2013, at 13:33, Eliot Lear <lear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> So your point is that their conclusions that nobody has the record
> installed is false?
> 
> Eliot
> 
> On 8/21/13 12:42 PM, Patrik Fältström wrote:
>> On 21 aug 2013, at 12:26, Eliot Lear <lear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>>> The easy part was supposed to be people actually using the SPF record, once it was out there.  And so your data doesn't indicate what sort of answers you're getting.
>> These are logs on one of my authoritative servers, and the queries you see are the queries sent _TO_ the server. So of course I also have the responses I give to the one those queries.
>> 
>>   Patrik
>> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]