Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>* The charter disallows major protocol changes -- removing the SPF RR type
>is a direct charter violation; since SPF is being used on the Internet. ...

Uh huh.

$ dig besserwisser.org txt

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;besserwisser.org.		IN	TXT

;; ANSWER SECTION:
besserwisser.org.	86173	IN	TXT	"MN-1334-RIPE"
besserwisser.org.	86173	IN	TXT	"v=spf0x44 be allowed to contaminate the DNS."
besserwisser.org.	86173	IN	TXT	"v=spf0x42 besides, SPF as concept is a layering violation."
besserwisser.org.	86173	IN	TXT	"v=spf0x41 not valid. because SPF records belong in RRtype 99."
besserwisser.org.	86173	IN	TXT	"v=spf0x43 adding insult to injury, this layering violation MUST not "

$ dig besserwisser.org spf

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;besserwisser.org.		IN	SPF

;; ANSWER SECTION:
besserwisser.org.	86140	IN	SPF	"v=spf1 ip6:0::/0 -all"
besserwisser.org.	86140	IN	SPF	"v=spf1 ip4:0.0.0.0/0 -all"

R's,
John






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]