>>>>> "Black," == Black, David <david.black@xxxxxxx> writes:
Black,> done. IMHO, we really should be setting a bar that says
Black,> that this sort of IETF imprimatur of approval of a crypto
Black,> algorithm actually means something.
Something got manged there.
I agree that publishing a standards-track document should endorce the
algorithm in question.
I'm somewhat uncomfortable with that sort of bar for IANA registries in
general, although I have supported it from time to time. (My discomfort
with this has grown significantly since my time as an AD). I do not
support that sort of bar for this registry.
I think we understand each other, but disagree.
The question now is whether you can gain sufficient support to show
rough consensus for a change in the document or to show that while there
was rough consensus behind the document in the KARP WG, there's a lack
of consensus on handling this issue between KARP and some other
significant segment of the IETF like the security area.