Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx)
From: "John Levine" <johnl@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 4 Aug 2013 19:53:42 -0000
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <51FE19F6.6050407@pi.nu>
Organization:

>If there is a serious drive to discontinue the weekly posting
>summary - I strongly object.

As far as I can tell, one person objects, everyone else thinks it's fine.

Seems like rough consensus to me.

R's,
John

Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx)
  - From: Jari Arkko
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx)
  - From: John C Klensin
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx)
  - From: Melinda Shore

References:
- Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx)
  - From: Loa Andersson

Prev by Date: Re: Anonymity versus Pseudonymity (was Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation)
Next by Date: Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx)
Previous by thread: Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx)
Next by thread: Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]