On 06/08/13 19:03, Keith Moore wrote:
But if we're only concerned with making presentation slides available,
we're selling ourselves very short. That's the point I'm trying to
make.
Keith
Hi Keith,
Thanks for clarifying it - agree with you fully on this point.
Keeping a clear goal in mind helps improve our current practice, and I
pretty much like what Joe hinted:
On 06/08/13 18:41, Joe Abley wrote:
The best outcome at a working group meeting is that, as a presenter,
you spend most of your time listening rather than talking. If the mic
line is empty, you probably should not have been on the agenda. Joe
How to get remote participants involved in meaningful discussion
deserves our close attention, besides to improve the experience for f2f
participants, e.g., presenters. (IMO, when to upload slides and how to
coordinate is a WG specific issue and WG/session chairs can define a
rule of conduct in their own meetings so it works best there, for both
remote and f2f)
Cheers,
Aaron
PS: I personally find it rather funny to see people claiming one's own
approach works better and so forth implicitly indicating they really
understand what remote/f2f participants need, and even so, we others
should follow... which somehow reminds me Dave Crocker once joked in
another thread that
"almost everyone claims that they are a better than average driver" ;)