2 aug 2013 kl. 16:12 skrev Dan York <york@xxxxxxxx>: > Olle, > > > On 8/2/13 12:24 PM, "Olle E. Johansson" <oej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> In rtcweb we have remote participants that prefer anonymity for a number >> of reasons. >> >> The question is how this is handled in regards to note well, when they >> want jabber scribes to relay opinions or proposals to the meeting. >> >> Just a note for the future. I think we should allow anonymous listeners, >> but should they really be allowed to participate? > > We don't allow anonymous comments at the microphone in face-to-face > meetings, requiring all people to clearly state their names and have those > names recorded in the meeting minutes and in the Jabber log. I don't > see why we would change this for remote participants. > > In all the years I've been doing Jabber-scribing, I've actually never run > into a case where a remote attendee requested anonymity. I would have > been puzzled like you. Obviously, anyone can be "anonymous" when joining > a Jabber chat room and can even make all the comments they want in the > chat room, but I think the moment they request a relay to the mic and the > comment goes into the audio record and thereby also the meeting minutes > then the comment needs to have a name attached to it. > (moving to ietf mailing list) Absolutely. Now, should we add an automatic message when someone joins the chat rooms, or a message when meetings begin that all comments made in the chat room is also participation under the note well? /O