Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 8/10/2013 12:29 PM, Wesley Eddy wrote:
On 8/10/2013 1:43 AM, Martin Sustrik wrote:
Hi all,

Does anyone have any idea how widely is TCPMUX (RFC 1078) protocol used?
Is it the case that there are inetd daemons in TCPMUX mode running
everywhere, or can it be rather considered a dead protocol?

Specifically, if I implement a new TCPMUX daemon how likely I am to
clash with an existing TCPMUX daemon listening on port 1?



It's in the FreeBSD inetd, among others, but to to my
knowledge, nobody actually turns it on.  There are
probably security issues.

There are semantics issues to; see draft-touch-tcp-portnames-00 for information (this is being revised for resubmission shortly, FWIW).

Joe




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]