Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/19/2013 11:33 PM, Patrik Fältström wrote:
Reason for this is that the RR with an underscored prefix MIGHT end up in a different zone than the record without.


Patrik,

Please clarify. I don't know what you mean by the 'with' and 'without' references.

And as long as I'm asking for more explanation, given the number of years of use the construct has had and for the number of different applications, where has the problem (whatever you mean specifically) been seen?

d/

--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]