Re: The Friday Report (was Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 3 Aug 2013 11:14, "Ole Jacobsen (ole)" <ole@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> It was never a distraction until AB started complaining about it. Been serving a useful purpose for many, many years. Procmail is your friend.
>

+1 for that

--- Roger ---
> Ole J. Jacobsen
> Editor & Publisher
> http://cisco.com/ipj
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Aug 3, 2013, at 9:12, "Heasley" <heas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Am Aug 3, 2013 um 9:05 schrieb Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> >> On 8/3/13, Patrik Fältström <paf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> On 3 aug 2013, at 08:46, Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I prefer if you post at end of Friday (as in the end of working days of 5 in each week).
> >>
> >>>> However, in my comment below I
> >>>> will follow the week as done in world calender, start from Sunday
> >>>> (mornings) and ends on Saturday (nights).
> >>>
> >>> The day a week starts, and what days are working days in a week, differs
> >>> between cultures. Many have Sunday-Thursday as working days. Many have
> >>> Monday as the first day of the week.
> >>
> >> I suggested to Thomas to submit report in end of Friday (read what i
> >
> > I suggest eliminating the report. As it doesn't measure content quality, one's contribution can't be measured by the email they produce. So, it is only a guage of  the distraction they produce. The report itself is a distraction.


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]